Liberty Justice Center

Small businesses are challenging the Trump administration's new tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act, arguing the tariffs were improperly justified and will harm their operations. Lawsuits were filed by companies including Burlap & Barrel, Collective Horology, and Learning Resources, which previously contested earlier tariff regimes.

Small businesses and a Vernon Hills toymaker have sued the Trump administration over new tariffs on 60 trade partners, alleging arbitrary enforcement under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits follow a prior Supreme Court ruling against similar tariffs. Justice Samuel Alito recused himself 23 times during the 2025-26 term, citing direct stock holdings.

Small businesses are suing over Trump's new tariffs, which use Section 301 to impose levies on 60 trading partners covering 99% of U.S. imports. Plaintiffs argue the government failed to justify the tariffs' legal basis under the statute. The tariffs replace expired global tariffs and face challenges similar to prior ones that were struck down by the Supreme Court.

Small businesses have filed two lawsuits challenging Trump’s new Section 301 tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners covering 99% of U.S. imports. The lawsuits argue the government failed to establish sufficient justification for the tariffs, which critics claim aim to replace expired global tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. Companies like Learning Resources, Burlap and Barrel, and Collective Horology, represented by Liberty Justice Center, assert the tariffs violate legal requirements under Section 301.

Small businesses have filed two lawsuits challenging Trump's new tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits argue the government failed to adequately justify the tariffs' legal basis, with critics suggesting the tariffs aim to replace previously struck-down global tariffs. Companies like Learning Resources, Burlap and Barrel, and Collective Horology are represented by the Liberty Justice Center in the legal challenges.

Small businesses have filed lawsuits challenging Trump's new tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits argue the government failed to adequately justify the tariffs' necessity for preventing forced labor. Critics suggest the tariffs aim to replace previous global tariffs invalidated by the Supreme Court.

Two small businesses sued the Trump administration over new tariffs targeting forced labor, arguing the use of Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 was unlawful. The lawsuit claims the administration failed to demonstrate how the tariffs address foreign forced labor policies and asserts the tariffs disproportionately harm U.S. businesses.

A new lawsuit challenges the Trump administration's recent tariffs, alleging they exceed legal authority. The Liberty Justice Center, which previously opposed earlier tariffs, argues the administration replaced an expired global tariff with another under a different statute without proper justification.

LSU is projected to finish fifth in the SEC this season, with Georgia predicted as the champion. Two small businesses sued the Trump administration over newly imposed tariffs, and the Port of Long Beach plans to explore building a nuclear reactor to power the port.

Four Nebraska gun owners are suing Lincoln, arguing the city lacks authority to ban concealed weapons in parks and trails under a 2023 state law allowing constitutional carry. The city claims the law did not remove its power to regulate firearms on its property, while plaintiffs assert public spaces are not private property. The case involves conflicting interpretations of Legislative Bill 77, which permits concealed carry without a permit.

The Supreme Court is expected to release 20 more opinions in argued cases by early July, with some coming today. A July 8 event at Johns Hopkins University will discuss birthright citizenship and feature ACLU’s Cecillia Wang. A conservative nonprofit, Liberty Justice Center, faced donor losses after challenging Trump’s tariffs but continues to oppose new tariffs. The Court’s upcoming decision on election ballot grace periods may impact military voting, and Georgia lawmakers will not redraw voting districts during a special session following a Supreme Court ruling.

The Court of International Trade ruled that President Trump's newest round of tariffs were illegal, imposing a 10% across-the-board surcharge set to expire July 24. The trade court's decision is another legal setback for the White House's trade policy. The administration is likely to appeal the decision.