Supreme Court
Tracked across 3,161 articles in the Nexus archive. Showing the most recent 40.
- Trump’s ballroom is no ‘monument’ — it’s an abuse of constitutional power
The article suggests that Trump's ballroom is not a 'monument,' but rather an abuse of constitutional power. It further states that "national security" is used by Trump to justify executive overreach, particularly when engaging with the Supreme Court.
- Pakistan’s top court orders imprisoned former PM Imran Khan taken to hospital, allows family visits
Pakistan’s Supreme Court has ordered that authorities take former Prime Minister Imran Khan to a private hospital in the capital for a medical examination. The court's directive also allows for family visits.
- The ‘political Supreme Court’ trope is part of a media disinformation campaign
The article identifies the ‘political Supreme Court’ trope as a component of a media disinformation campaign. This critique addresses the notion that the court operates as a rubber stamp for the MAGA agenda, suggesting this belief stems from a mistaken view that quantity is more important than quality.
- Voting rights anniversary spotlights America’s enduring anti-Black contempt
The 61st anniversary of the Voting Rights Act prompted discussions regarding its weakening due to Supreme Court rulings that ended federal preclearance. Critics warn that this 'hollowing out' of the VRA has allowed efforts to hinder Black and Latino representation, prompting some experts to describe the resulting environment as a modern-day political Jim Crow. Despite local successes, activists note that the national protections provided by the law are currently on life support.
- Angry at the Supreme Court, liberals push a slew of plans for overhauling it
Liberals are proposing plans to overhaul the Supreme Court due to anger directed at the institution. As midterms near, Democrats have begun advocating for changes, including adding more justices or limiting their current terms.
- Supreme Court emergency docket roars back
The Supreme Court’s emergency docket has resumed activity during the justices' summer recess. President Trump urged the justices to revive mail ballot restrictions and allow White House ballroom construction to continue, placing the high court under scrutiny after its key rulings on other issues.
- Jaxson Dart gets last laugh against blitzing Vikings coach Brian Flores and the ominous blue medical tent
Jaxson Dart was severely hit during a preseason game, resulting in multiple evaluations for concussion concern, though he eventually cleared medical evaluation to return. Separately, the article reports that the Supreme Court handed the NFL a loss in Brian Flores's discrimination lawsuit, which is ongoing four years later.
- ‘The Odyssey’ reminds us of the nightmare we are leaving for American children
Using Christopher Nolan's "The Odyssey" as an analogy, the article argues that modern political systems suffer from a problem resembling taxation without representation. The text highlights national debt exceeding $40 trillion and claims politicians use money belonging to people who have not yet been born to buy votes. Ultimately, it suggests that current governmental issues are driven by incentives rather than sound statecraft.
- Trump scores major immigration victory as judge clears way to end TPS protections for thousands of Somalis
U.S. District Judge Allison Burroughs lifted a stay, allowing the administration to proceed with terminating Temporary Protected Status (TPS) protections for thousands of Somali nationals. This decision follows a Supreme Court ruling in Mullin v. Doe that limited judicial review of such termination actions. The move potentially exposes affected migrants who lack lawful alternatives to remaining in the U.S. to deportation.
- DOJ refers to Air Force One threat as ‘assassination attempt’ in ballroom appeal
The Justice Department characterized an incident involving an Iranian missile threat and President Trump switching planes as an “assassination attempt” in a new court filing. U.S. Solicitor General John Sauer mentioned this event while submitting an emergency appeal to the Supreme Court to challenge a lower court’s block.
- An Unlikely Emergency Appeal to the Supreme Court from a Dog Named Bruce
The Supreme Court has been inundated recently with emergency requests. The title notes an unlikely type of appeal, suggesting a request directed to the court from a dog named Bruce.
- Trucking Is Booming Again, And Drivers Aren't Happy About It
Freight companies are experiencing a significant upturn with increasing volumes and billing. Despite this boom in demand, drivers are unhappy due to new supply constraints implemented by the administration and rising surveillance. Furthermore, a recent Supreme Court ruling could potentially impair industry capacity.
- Blockchain Association backs Custodia’s Supreme Court bid over Fed master account access
The Blockchain Association is backing Custodia’s attempt in the Supreme Court concerning access to Fed master accounts. The industry group stated that this case aims to ensure 'lawful digital asset businesses can compete on equal footing.'
- A surprise credit after an overseas purchase: The tariff refunds now flowing through shippers
Shippers such as FedEx, UPS, and DHL have begun passing on tariff refunds received from the U.S. government to customers who originally paid the tariffs for imported goods. These refunds are part of a monthslong process initiated after the Supreme Court struck down sweeping tariffs implemented by President Donald Trump in March 2025. Consumers can check carrier portals, like FedEx's website, to determine if they are due a refund, though most big retailers used the funds to lower prices rather than issuing direct consumer refunds.
- A surprise credit after an overseas purchase: The tariff refunds now flowing through shippers
Following a Supreme Court decision that struck down sweeping tariffs implemented by President Donald Trump in March 2025, shippers like FedEx, UPS, and DHL are beginning to pass on tariff refunds received from the U.S. government to customers. These refunds are the last step in a monthslong process of returning tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act on imported goods. Customers who originally paid tariffs may check specific carrier websites for details on receiving their direct refund.
- Ventura County euthanizes dog after appeals fail and emergency motion filed with Supreme Court
Ventura County euthanized Bruce, a 3-year-old Great Pyrenees mix, which had been deemed vicious after bite incidents. This action occurred despite the filing of an emergency motion with the Supreme Court and failed appeals.
- Legal groups ask court to restore block on Trump order on birthright citizenship
The American Civil Liberties Union petitioned a federal court in New Hampshire to reaffirm that Donald Trump’s executive order ending birthright citizenship is unconstitutional, as it allegedly violates the 14th Amendment of the U.S. Constitution. The attempted orders sought to expand exemptions and end 'birth tourism,' but legal groups argue they conflict with previous Supreme Court rulings establishing birthright citizenship.
- Trump refuses to back down as Supreme Court blocks major policies
After the Supreme Court blocked major policies, Trump has refused to back down from his actions. The president is seeking methods around rulings related to tariffs, birthright citizenship, and the Fed. Experts noted that these moves push the court’s limits but do not signal outright defiance.
- Trump Officials Under Pressure to Deport Haitians After Supreme Court Win on T.P.S. Program
Trump officials face pressure to deport Haitians after a Supreme Court win concerning the T.P.S. Program. Additionally, some supporters of President Trump view Markwayne Mullin, identified as the homeland security secretary, as being soft on immigration enforcement.
- What to know about Trump's new attempt to limit birthright citizenship
The Trump administration issued executive orders attempting to limit birthright citizenship and restrict benefits for foreigners giving birth in the U.S., despite a previous Supreme Court ruling. These new restrictions focus on specific categories, including children born to adults with foreign connections, those involved in "birth tourism," or employees of foreign embassies. The measures also exclude children of parents tied to groups deemed terrorist organizations.
- What to know about Trump's new attempt to limit birthright citizenship
The Trump administration issued executive orders attempting to restrict birthright citizenship and places of birth for foreigners, despite a previous Supreme Court decision striking down similar attempts. President Donald Trump's new measures aim to disqualify automatic citizenship for children born to certain groups, including those with foreign connections or deemed an “alien enemy,” and they also raise issues regarding surrogacy and parental ties to groups like Antifa.
- Voters Retain Tennessee Appellate Court Judges, Elect Unopposed Nashville Candidates
Tennessee voters retained seven higher court judges facing a retention vote in appellate courts. Furthermore, several local candidates claimed seats after winning their Democratic primaries and running unopposed in the general election for various judicial and school board positions.
- Trump’s birthright citizenship attack the latest effort in obsessive campaign
Donald Trump utilized executive orders to attempt undermining the constitutional right of birthright citizenship. These orders aim to broaden categories of children ineligible for automatic US citizenship and restrict what the president described as “birth tourism.” The document notes that this right was enshrined in the US constitution and reaffirmed by the supreme court just five weeks ago.
- TPS for up to 350,000 Haitians officially ends as judge applies Supreme Court order
A federal judge lifted a stay on the termination of Temporary Protected Status for between 330,000 to 350,000 Haitians, requiring compliance with a U.S. Supreme Court ruling. The order allows the removal of their legal status and potential deportation, despite ongoing legal arguments regarding racial discrimination. The remaining claim focuses on whether the decision to end TPS was based on racial animus.
- New districts scramble candidate qualifying for Louisiana’s US House races
Louisiana altered its congressional district boundaries after a U.S. Supreme Court ruling allowed them to eliminate one majority-Black seat. This reworking moved candidates between the 5th and 6th Districts, changing rivalries among those running for the U.S. House.
- Tennessee secretary of state on redistricting, low turnout
Tennessee voters participate in primaries following the Supreme Court's approval of new congressional maps. President Trump's continued questions about election integrity may impact voter confidence, as discussed with Tennessee Secretary of State Tre Hargett.
- Trump administration pays out milestone $100 billion in tariff refunds
The Trump administration has paid out $100 billion in tariff refunds, which is more than half of the $166 billion owed to American businesses that paid tariffs invalidated by the Supreme Court.
- Bihar Governor appoints Upendra Kushwaha’s son Deepak Prakash as MLC
Bihar Governor appointed Deepak Prakash, son of Upendra Kushwaha, as MLC. BJP MLC Devesh Kumar resigned after the Supreme Court questioned Prakash's status as an unelected Minister.
- Rural broadband subsidies on the chopping block at Fifth Circuit
A Fifth Circuit panel is reviewing a challenge to the FCC's rural broadband subsidies, which could lead to billions in cuts to programs for schools, libraries, and health clinics. Petitioners argue the FCC violated the Supreme Court's recent interpretation of Section 254 of the Communications Act by continuing to fund programs that do not meet its criteria, specifically targeting the Connect America Fund Phase II and Rural Digital Opportunity Fund.
- Parliament clears Bill to increase number of judges in Supreme Court
Parliament passed a Bill to increase the number of judges in the Supreme Court. Opposition members walked out before the voting, and Congress MP and senior lawyer Vivek Tankha questioned whether the pendency in the Supreme Court will be cleared by the appointment of four new judges.
- Court confirms that temporary deportation protections for Haitians are no longer in place
A federal judge confirmed that temporary deportation protections for Haitians have ended, allowing the Trump administration to terminate the Temporary Protected Status (TPS) program. The Supreme Court previously reversed a judge's order that had halted the termination, leading to uncertainty about the removal of protections for approximately 350,000 Haitians. The decision enables deportations to Haiti, which the State Department warns is dangerous and unstable.
- Supreme Court cracks down on illegal constructions, warns civic authorities of contempt
The Supreme Court has taken action against illegal constructions and warned civic authorities that interfering with its orders could lead to contempt proceedings. The court also restricted municipal authorities from issuing contradictory directives.
- Majority legislators cannot overrule will of political party: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that majority legislators cannot overrule the will of their political party. Justice Joymalya Bagchi emphasized that a democracy's maturity is measured by the constancy of political parties and their members to their ideology.
- Police modernisation scheme awaits Finance Ministry’s nod, Centre tells SC
The police modernisation scheme is awaiting approval from the Finance Ministry, as informed by the Centre to the Supreme Court. The court had initiated suo motu proceedings over non-functional CCTV cameras in police stations linked to an increase in custodial deaths.
- A Cellphone Is Not a Suitcase
Atlanta activist Samuel Tunick was charged with destruction of evidence for using a duress password to delete his phone's data during a warrantless border search by federal agents. The case highlights a legal loophole allowing warrantless cellphone searches at international ports of entry under the Fourth Amendment's border exception, which critics argue fails to account for the privacy implications of modern smartphones.
- The justices should hold regular press conferences
The Supreme Court justices have a limited and controlled relationship with the press, using methods like hard passes, annual reports, and occasional interviews. They monitor press coverage extensively but rarely respond to leaks, except in rare cases like the Dobbs draft opinion. Justices also engage with the press on their own terms, such as during book promotions or pre-approved speaking events.
- Governors and lawmakers say they’re getting serious about states’ rights
Governors from Colorado and Utah, representing different political parties, discussed the need to rebalance state and federal power at the National Governors Association meeting. They emphasized states' rights over elections, energy, and education, with bipartisan calls for reducing federal influence and returning authority to states.
- What does the Trump administration want from the Supreme Court next?
The Trump administration and President Donald Trump's legal team are asking the Supreme Court to review an $83.3 million defamation judgment against him, arguing for immunity. The administration also has pending petitions on immigration detention policies, the Second Amendment, the U.S. DOGE Service, and transgender troop policies, with a focus on Raycraft v. Lopez-Campos, which challenges detention without bond for noncitizens apprehended within the U.S.
- The October argument session
The Supreme Court released its October argument session calendar, which runs from October 5 to October 14. A U.S. appeals court reversed a prior decision favoring Jack Daniel’s in a trademark dispute with VIP Products over a dog toy parodying whiskey bottles. The Supreme Court previously vacated the 9th Circuit’s 2020 ruling but the appeals court reinstated a sales ban reversal in 2024. Meanwhile, ICE is outfitting Haitian immigrants with ankle monitors following a Supreme Court decision ending their deportation protections.
- States cannot cite financial burden to oppose raising retirement age of judicial officers: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot use financial burden as a reason to oppose increasing the retirement age of judicial officers. The court stated that retaining experienced judicial officers may result in lower financial costs compared to replacing them.