U.S. Court of International Trade

A U.S. trade judge urged the Trump administration to expedite over $10 billion in illegal tariff refunds, citing inequities in processing delays. An appeals court in Alabama raised concerns about using nitrogen gas for executions, reversing a prior ruling that deemed it constitutional.

A U.S. Customs official is set to testify about the government's plans for refunding billions in tariffs illegally imposed by President Donald Trump. The dispute centers on whether all businesses that paid the tariffs or only those involved in lawsuits can claim refunds, with the Justice Department arguing for the latter. The refund process, which has distributed $20.6 billion so far, remains contentious as courts debate the eligibility criteria.

Trump plans to appeal a federal judge's order allowing all companies that paid invalidated tariffs to seek refunds, not just those that filed lawsuits. The U.S. Supreme Court previously ruled Trump lacked authority to impose higher import taxes, leading to a refund process now threatened by the administration's legal challenge.

The U.S. Court of International Trade ordered Customs and Border Protection Commissioner Rodney Scott to testify at a June 9 hearing in New York regarding the Trump administration's tariff refunds process. The hearing will address the implementation of these refunds.

A federal trade court struck down tariffs imposed by President Trump after the Supreme Court loss earlier this year. The U.S. Court of International Trade imposed a permanent injunction on the 10 percent tariff on nearly all U.S. imports. This decision affects tariffs imposed in February.

The U.S. government anticipates issuing the first refunds of President Trump’s invalidated tariffs around May 11, as revealed by court documents. Judge Richard Eaton of the U.S. Court of International Trade confirmed the timeline after a closed hearing, with Customs and Border Protection (CBP) processing $166 billion in refunds.

The article discusses a trade court battle over President Trump's 10% global tariffs, with judges interpreting a 1974 trade law. Small businesses and blue states challenged the tariffs, which Trump imposed after the Supreme Court's ruling.

A federal court is reviewing challenges to President Donald Trump's temporary global tariffs, which were imposed under Section 122 of the Trade Act of 1974 after the Supreme Court invalidated his initial IEEPA-based tariffs. The case centers on whether Section 122 authorizes tariffs to address trade deficits, with the tariffs set to expire in July 2026.

The U.S. Court of International Trade is reviewing President Trump's 10 percent global import tax on foreign goods following the Supreme Court's rejection of his broader tariff plan. Trump announced the tariff as a response to the Supreme Court's decision, which invalidated much of his original tariff agenda.

President Trump's new 10-percent global tariffs face a legal challenge at the U.S. Court of International Trade. The court will review the tariffs after the Supreme Court previously invalidated Trump's earlier tariffs for using emergency powers. Democratic-led states and small businesses oppose the measures.