International Emergency Economic Powers Act

Following a Supreme Court decision that struck down sweeping tariffs implemented by President Donald Trump in March 2025, shippers like FedEx, UPS, and DHL are beginning to pass on tariff refunds received from the U.S. government to customers. These refunds are the last step in a monthslong process of returning tariffs collected under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act on imported goods. Customers who originally paid tariffs may check specific carrier websites for details on receiving their direct refund.

North Carolina Attorney General Jeff Jackson has filed multiple lawsuits against the Trump administration. One suit challenges a new round of tariffs on 80 countries, arguing that the measures violate the Administrative Procedure Act and exceed legal authority. Additionally, Jackson sued FEMA and DHS for threatening to withhold over $1 billion promised in federal grant funds meant for state disaster response and counterterrorism efforts.

The Trump administration has disbursed $100 billion in tariff refunds to U.S. companies under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), but consumers are suing firms like Five Below and Sony for not passing refunds to them. Lawsuits allege companies retained profits by raising prices to cover tariffs while collecting refunds, with no confirmation of returning funds to customers.

President Trump imposed new tariffs on over 80 countries using Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, avoiding the legal challenges that previously struck down tariffs under IEEPA. Legal experts are divided, with some arguing the broader precedent for Section 301 strengthens the administration's position, while others highlight concerns about the rushed and expansive nature of the penalties.

Small businesses are challenging the Trump administration's new tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act, arguing the tariffs were improperly justified and will harm their operations. Lawsuits were filed by companies including Burlap & Barrel, Collective Horology, and Learning Resources, which previously contested earlier tariff regimes.

Small businesses and a Vernon Hills toymaker have sued the Trump administration over new tariffs on 60 trade partners, alleging arbitrary enforcement under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits follow a prior Supreme Court ruling against similar tariffs. Justice Samuel Alito recused himself 23 times during the 2025-26 term, citing direct stock holdings.

Two small businesses sued the Trump administration over new tariffs targeting forced labor, arguing the use of Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 was unlawful. The lawsuit claims the administration failed to demonstrate how the tariffs address foreign forced labor policies and asserts the tariffs disproportionately harm U.S. businesses.

President Donald Trump imposed new tariffs under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, replacing earlier tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. Experts warn this could establish a precedent for future presidents to impose tariffs broadly for any reason, bypassing legal challenges.

President Trump imposed new replacement tariffs on the U.S.'s 60 largest trading partners, including the European Union, after the Supreme Court ruled against his previous tariff strategy. The new tariffs, justified under a law targeting unfair trade practices and forced labor, feature two tiers (10% and 12.5%) and exclude certain imports like energy and food.

President Donald Trump imposed new import tariffs ranging from 10% to 12.5% on products from nearly 60 countries, including Canada, the European Union, and Japan, citing forced labor conditions. These tariffs replace a previous global tariff and could affect 99.4% of imports, following a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated earlier duties under the IEEPA.

President Donald Trump reimposes 10% to 12.5% tariffs on 60 countries over inadequate enforcement of forced labor bans, replacing temporary tariffs that expired Friday. The tariffs, under Section 301 of the Trade Act, target 99% of U.S. imports, with exemptions for oil, gas, fertilizer, and USMCA-eligible products. Some countries, like India, received lower tariffs after improving labor enforcement.

President Donald Trump is imposing new double-digit tariffs (10% to 12.5%) on imports from 60 trading partners, citing inadequate enforcement of forced labor bans. These tariffs replace temporary 10% levies that expired Friday, using Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to justify the action after a Supreme Court ruling invalidated earlier tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

President Donald Trump is imposing new 10% to 12.5% tariffs on imports from 60 countries, citing inadequate enforcement of forced labor bans. These tariffs replace temporary 10% levies set to expire Friday and are authorized under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The move follows a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated earlier tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

President Donald Trump is imposing new 10% to 12.5% tariffs on imports from 60 countries, citing inadequate enforcement of bans on goods produced by forced labor. The tariffs, effective as temporary 10% levies expire, are justified under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, following a Supreme Court ruling that invalidated earlier tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

President Donald Trump is using Section 338 of the Tariff Act to impose potential 50% tariffs on Canadian imports after the Supreme Court blocked his previous attempt. The tariffs target goods like dairy products, alcohol, and automobiles, with legal challenges expected over Canada's policies.

SCOTUSblog highlights memorable live blog comments from the 2024-25 and 2025-26 Supreme Court terms, including reader questions about clerks and tariffs. The article discusses recurring topics like the 'box count' and '#WaitingForAmy' during opinion announcements.

President Trump has imposed tariffs through three methods under legal authorities including the International Emergency Economic Powers Act and the Trade Act of 1974, but these measures face invalidation or expiration. The article attributes these actions to a pattern of diversionary tactics amid a series of public and political setbacks, including criticism at the World Cup, unpopularity linked to high prices, and conflicts in the Middle East.

A new Washington Post-Ipsos poll shows 46% of Americans believe the Supreme Court rules on Trump administration policies based on political views rather than law, with 55% disapproving of the court's performance. The Trump administration seeks Supreme Court intervention to uphold its ban on transgender troops and rebuild tariffs previously struck down by the court.

The Trump administration is working to replace lost tariff revenue after the Supreme Court invalidated key tariffs. The Treasury faces expiring Section 122 tariffs by July 24, with plans to use Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to impose new tariffs on countries like Brazil. Revenue from tariffs dropped sharply after the court ruling, leading to a $25.6 billion Treasury loss in June.

The US is imposing 25% tariffs on certain Brazilian imports starting July 22, citing unfair trade practices including lax anti-corruption enforcement. Exemptions include coffee, beef, and aerospace parts. Brazilian President Luiz Inácio Lula da Silva criticized the move, blaming his political rival Flávio Bolsonaro. The tariffs are under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974, following a yearlong investigation by the U.S. Trade Representative.

President Trump's tariff policy has led to ongoing price increases by U.S. companies, with 47% of service firms and 44% of manufacturers planning hikes. Businesses are using a 'trickle up' strategy to gradually raise prices, avoiding immediate consumer backlash. The New York Fed notes that 90% of tariff costs are borne by U.S. companies and consumers, contradicting Trump's claims that exporters would cover the costs.

Pakistan and the United States are holding trade negotiations in Washington to address US tariffs on Pakistani exports and finalize a bilateral trade agreement. Pakistan secured a reduction of tariffs from 29% to 19% in prior talks, but a US Supreme Court ruling invalidated the IEEPA-based tariffs, leading to a temporary 10% global tariff set to expire in July. Pakistan also faces a proposed 10% additional tariff under Section 301 investigations.

The US Supreme Court's recent rulings included decisions on tariffs, conversion therapy bans, and faith-based pregnancy center lawsuits, with Massachusetts involved in several cases through state lawsuits and amicus briefs. The court's conservative majority upheld limits on presidential emergency powers and signaled skepticism toward Colorado's conversion therapy ban, while Massachusetts has its own similar laws.

The Supreme Court expanded President Trump's control over federal agencies, including immigration and the Federal Trade Commission, but limited his authority over the Federal Reserve and tariffs. These rulings increased regulatory uncertainty for businesses while preserving some market stability.

U.S. Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey have criticized the Trump administration for failing to refund over $145 billion in tariffs deemed unlawful by the U.S. Supreme Court. They demanded the U.S. Customs and Border Protection Commissioner expedite refunds to small businesses for tariffs imposed under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey accused the Trump administration of delaying refunds for over $145 billion in tariffs ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court. The U.S. Customs and Border Protection has only refunded about $20.6 billion, leaving tens of billions unreturned, impacting small businesses that paid tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey accuse the Trump administration of delaying refunds for over $145 billion in unlawful tariffs, with only $20.6 billion processed. The Supreme Court ruled President Trump's global tariffs illegal, but the administration has faced criticism for slowing the refund process, leaving small businesses waiting for repayment.

U.S. Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey criticized the Trump administration for failing to refund over $145 billion in tariffs deemed unlawful by the U.S. Supreme Court. They demanded the Customs and Border Protection Commissioner expedite refunds to small businesses affected by the tariffs, which were ruled illegal in a February 2025 decision. Only $20.6 billion has been refunded, with $85 billion in processing and over $60 billion unprocessed.

U.S. Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey demanded the Trump administration refund over $145 billion in tariffs ruled unlawful by the Supreme Court, citing delays in processing payments to small businesses. The Trump administration has refunded only $20.6 billion, with $85 billion in processing and $60 billion unprocessed, according to court documents.

U.S. Senate Democrats Ron Wyden and Edward Markey demanded the Trump administration refund over $145 billion in tariffs deemed unlawful by the U.S. Supreme Court, criticizing delays in processing refunds for small businesses. The administration has only returned $20.6 billion, with $85 billion in processing and $60 billion unaddressed, despite court orders requiring repayment.

Jamshid Ghomi, 63, an Orange County business owner, is accused of supplying U.S. technology to Iran, according to federal prosecutors. He faces conspiracy charges related to violating the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

Jamshid Ghomi, a Newport Coast resident, is accused of conspiring to violate the International Emergency Economic Powers Act by supplying U.S. technology to Iran, according to a federal criminal complaint.

Jamshid Ghomi, a Newport Coast-based CEO of an Iran-based technology company, was arrested on federal charges of illegally supplying U.S.-origin networking and encryption equipment to Iran's military and nuclear establishment. He faces conspiracy charges under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.

The US Justice Department has announced plans to appeal a judge's order requiring broad refunds of Trump-era tariffs, arguing the judge lacks authority to mandate nationwide refunds for all importers who paid tariffs under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act (IEEPA), even those who did not sue. The dispute centers on whether a recent Supreme Court ruling on birthright citizenship limits the scope of such refunds, potentially creating legal uncertainty in an ongoing claims process.

Donald Trump criticized Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as a 'low IQ person' during a tirade against the court's conservative majority, which he accused of blocking his tariff plan and potentially ruling against his birthright citizenship policy. Trump referred to Jackson as the 'new' female justice appointed by Joe Biden, highlighting his frustration with justices he claims no longer align with Republican values.

President Donald Trump criticized Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson as a 'low IQ person' during a tirade against the court's conservative majority, which he accused of blocking his tariff plan and potentially ruling against his birthright citizenship executive order. Trump highlighted his frustration with Republican justices not uniting and praised Democratic justices for their 'loyalty'.

A refund system for businesses that paid tariffs ruled unconstitutional by the U.S. Supreme Court under President Trump's authority is set to launch, allowing importers to claim refunds through an online portal. The process involves submitting declarations for eligible tariffs, with refunds expected to take 60-90 days and prioritizing recent payments.

Shamim Mafi, an Iranian national and U.S. lawful permanent resident, was arrested at LAX for allegedly brokering Iranian-made weapons sales to Sudan, including drones, bombs, and millions of rounds of ammunition, violating U.S. sanctions. She faces up to 20 years in prison if convicted under the International Emergency Economic Powers Act.