Burlap and Barrel

Small businesses are suing over Trump's new tariffs, which use Section 301 to impose levies on 60 trading partners covering 99% of U.S. imports. Plaintiffs argue the government failed to justify the tariffs' legal basis under the statute. The tariffs replace expired global tariffs and face challenges similar to prior ones that were struck down by the Supreme Court.

Small businesses have filed two lawsuits challenging Trump’s new Section 301 tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners covering 99% of U.S. imports. The lawsuits argue the government failed to establish sufficient justification for the tariffs, which critics claim aim to replace expired global tariffs struck down by the Supreme Court. Companies like Learning Resources, Burlap and Barrel, and Collective Horology, represented by Liberty Justice Center, assert the tariffs violate legal requirements under Section 301.

Small businesses have filed two lawsuits challenging Trump's new tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits argue the government failed to adequately justify the tariffs' legal basis, with critics suggesting the tariffs aim to replace previously struck-down global tariffs. Companies like Learning Resources, Burlap and Barrel, and Collective Horology are represented by the Liberty Justice Center in the legal challenges.

Small businesses have filed lawsuits challenging Trump's new tariffs, which impose double-digit levies on 60 trading partners under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974. The lawsuits argue the government failed to adequately justify the tariffs' necessity for preventing forced labor. Critics suggest the tariffs aim to replace previous global tariffs invalidated by the Supreme Court.