Supreme Court of the United States
Coverage of Supreme Court of the United States in the Nexus archive.
- Colo. GOP applauds SCOTUS ruling erasing limits on party spending coordinated with candidates
The Supreme Court struck down limits on political party spending coordinated with candidates, allowing national parties to directly contribute to campaigns. The Colorado Republican Party supports the ruling, citing it as free speech, while Republicans hold a financial advantage over Democrats.
- President Trump pushes legislation to end birthright citizenship after SCOTUS decision
President Trump pushed legislation to end birthright citizenship following a Supreme Court decision that rejected his attempt. The Supreme Court's ruling, rooted in the 14th Amendment, led Trump to dismiss his loss as he continued advocating for policy changes.
- SCOTUS rules on birthright citizenship, strikes down Trump’s executive order
The Supreme Court of the United States struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order eliminating birthright citizenship, upholding the 14th Amendment. The case, Trump v. Barbara, addressed the order’s provision denying citizenship to children born in the U.S. to non-citizen parents, with lower courts having previously rejected the order.
- Supreme Court upholds state laws banning transgender girls, women from athletic teams
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating in school athletic teams.
- Supreme Court upholds state laws banning transgender girls, women from athletic teams
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating in school athletic teams. The decision was announced on Tuesday.
- Supreme Court upholds state laws banning transgender girls, women from athletic teams
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating in school athletic teams. The decision supports existing restrictions on transgender student athletes in specific categories.
- Supreme Court upholds state laws banning transgender girls, women from athletic teams
The Supreme Court of the United States ruled to uphold state laws that prohibit transgender girls and women from participating in school athletic teams. The decision was issued on Tuesday but does not mention specific states or further details about the laws.
- Illinoisans praise mail-in ballot decision, affirming election admin. largely under state control
Illinoisans are praising the Supreme Court's mail-in ballots ruling, which affirms that election administration remains largely under state control. The decision has been welcomed as a reinforcement of state authority over electoral processes.
- Hunter v. United States – the most important criminal case of the term
In Hunter v. United States, the Supreme Court ruled that appeal waivers in federal criminal plea bargains are unenforceable if they result in a 'miscarriage of justice.' The case involved Munson Hunter III, who waived his right to appeal but argued that a court-ordered medication condition during supervised release violated his constitutional rights.
- How Virginia's abortion access is still being shaped four years after Roe v. Wade overturning
Abortion access in Virginia remains a focus four years after the Supreme Court overturned Roe v. Wade. While abortion is currently legal in the state, voters will determine in November whether to enshrine the right to access into Virginia's constitution.
- Justices issue orders on murder-for-hire case involving social media influencer, the role of race in seizing persons, and the execution of a Texas man claiming to be intellectually disabled
The Supreme Court ordered a lower court to reevaluate a murder-for-hire case involving Ashley Grayson, a Texas-based social media influencer, after the government conceded the court applied the wrong rule regarding a recorded FaceTime call. The court also denied review in two other criminal cases, with dissents from Justice Samuel Alito and the court’s three Democratic appointees.
- SCOTUS issues bombshell ruling on marijuana and gun rights ... in an explosive twist for Hunter Biden
The Supreme Court issued a significant ruling on marijuana and gun rights, creating an impactful development for Hunter Biden. The decision is described as a major legal shift with potential consequences for his case.
- Trump’s firing power faces twin Supreme Court tests, but one agency may get special treatment
Two Supreme Court cases, Slaughter v. Trump and Trump v. Cook, are testing President Donald Trump's authority to remove federal officials. The cases involve the firing of FTC Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, with differing legal arguments over statutory removal limits versus 'for cause' requirements.
- Freedom is not free for everyone
Devon Thomas, a Black Vermonter and pastor, reflects on Juneteenth and the Supreme Court's recent ruling that weakened the Voting Rights Act, emphasizing ongoing struggles for racial and social justice. He connects these issues to Vermont's history, including Confederate flag displays and systemic inequities affecting both minority and white low-income communities.
- Texas teens call on SCOTUS to block app store age check
Texas students, including M.F. and Z.B., have petitioned the Supreme Court to block Texas' App Store Accountability Act, which mandates age verification for app downloads and parental consent for minors under 18. They argue the law disproportionately restricts access to non-harmful content like educational apps, violating the First Amendment. The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) supports the challenge, comparing the law to overreaching age verification requirements for physical businesses.
- Denver asks SCOTUS to halt $14M payout to George Floyd protesters
Denver has petitioned the Supreme Court to halt a $14 million payout to 12 protesters injured by police during the 2020 George Floyd protests. The city argues that an independent monitor's testimony improperly influenced the jury's verdict, which found excessive force by Denver police. The 10th Circuit upheld the verdict, but Denver seeks a stay to review the case in SCOTUS, citing potential harm to taxpayers.
- Clarence Thomas puts Dems on clock as Alabama GOP emergency map bid stalled
Justice Clarence Thomas delayed a decision on Alabama Republicans' emergency bid to revive their 2023 congressional map, ordering plaintiffs to justify its use by Monday. The map, blocked by a lower court, was replaced by a special-master map that created a second Black-opportunity district and helped Democrats gain a House seat. The case follows a Supreme Court ruling narrowing the Voting Rights Act's Section 2 interpretation, fueling GOP-led redistricting challenges.
- Supreme Court Reverses Ruling in Immigration Judges’ Free Speech Lawsuit
The U.S. Supreme Court reversed a Fourth Circuit ruling in a lawsuit involving immigration judges' free speech claims, stating the lower court overstepped its authority. The decision was unanimous with no noted dissents.
- Thomas blasts SCOTUS for decision on Florida lawsuit over illegal immigrant truckers with blue-state licenses
Justice Clarence Thomas criticized the Supreme Court for refusing to hear Florida's lawsuit against California and Washington over their issuance of commercial driver’s licenses to illegal immigrants, arguing it violates federal standards and poses public safety risks. Thomas and Justice Samuel Alito emphasized the Court's constitutional duty to resolve state disputes, citing a fatal Florida crash involving a driver who received licenses from the two blue states.
- Justice Jackson warns an increasingly partisan Supreme Court
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned the Supreme Court's conservative super-majority that they may have crossed ethical or procedural boundaries by becoming increasingly partisan. The caution highlights concerns about the court's perceived politicization.
- How the Supreme Court both checks and empowers Donald Trump
The Supreme Court acts as a check on Donald Trump by blocking his most blatantly illegal actions, while simultaneously enabling him through favorable rulings in other areas. This dual role highlights the Court's influence in shaping his political and legal landscape.
- AOC tells New Yorkers to ‘pull up’ to Alabama during rally speech behind bulletproof glass
Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez sparked controversy during a rally in Alabama, urging northern progressives to 'pull up' to Southern states to combat political injustice. Her speech criticized the Supreme Court and highlighted historical voting rights issues, drawing backlash from conservatives who mocked her security setup and rhetoric. Critics, including podcasters and social media influencers, accused her of divisiveness and hypocrisy.
- Clarence Thomas triumphs — and his legal vision, too
Clarence Thomas's 34-year Supreme Court tenure has solidified his legal philosophy of originalism, transforming it from a rhetorical concept into a foundational method influencing U.S. law.
- DOJ vows to appeal after judge dismisses smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia as 'vindictive'
A federal judge dismissed human smuggling charges against Kilmar Abrego Garcia, ruling the DOJ's prosecution was 'vindictive and selective' under the Fifth Amendment. The DOJ vowed to appeal, calling the decision 'wrong and dangerous,' while a senator praised the ruling as a victory for constitutional rights.
- SCOTUS ruling allows lawsuits over property seized by Cuban government
The Supreme Court ruled that four major cruise lines can be held liable for using the Port of Havana, which was seized by the Cuban government in 1960. This decision allows lawsuits to proceed against the cruise lines for their use of the confiscated American-built property.
- SCOTUS narrowly spares 'intellectually disabled' murderer from execution
The Supreme Court has ruled to spare the life of an intellectually disabled death row inmate, rejecting Alabama officials' appeal to proceed with execution. The decision narrowly prevents the execution of a prisoner deemed intellectually disabled, raising questions about capital punishment eligibility standards.
- Trump fires warning shot at SCOTUS as major citizenship showdown looms: ‘It will be a disaster’
President Trump criticized the Supreme Court ahead of an expected ruling on his executive order to restrict birthright citizenship, predicting the court will rule against him. The case centers on whether automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. complies with the 14th Amendment's citizenship clause. Trump argues birthright citizenship was intended for children of former slaves, not for wealthy foreigners seeking citizenship through 'birth tourism.'
- Trump fires warning shot at SCOTUS as major citizenship showdown looms: ‘It will be a disaster’
President Trump criticized the Supreme Court ahead of a major birthright citizenship ruling, predicting the justices will rule against his executive order limiting automatic citizenship for children born in the U.S. Trump argued the policy was originally intended for descendants of slaves and warned that allowing birthright citizenship will be economically disastrous.
- Trump says Supreme Court will do "a great disservice" if it upholds birthright citizenship
President Trump criticized the Supreme Court's decision on his tariff policy and warned the Court would do "a great disservice" if it upholds birthright citizenship. The comment comes as the Supreme Court prepares to rule on Trump's efforts to end birthright citizenship rights. CBS News reported on Trump's remarks made to reporters in the Oval Office.
- Clarence Thomas Against Progressivism—and Progressives
Justice Clarence Thomas delivered a speech expressing strong opposition to progressivism, characterizing the movement as fundamentally anti-American. Thomas's remarks reflect his longstanding judicial philosophy and conservative worldview regarding progressive ideology and its impact on American society.
- Jackson doubles down on criticism of fellow justices over Louisiana redistricting case: 'Be better'
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized the Supreme Court's handling of a Louisiana gerrymandering case, stating that the Court had been too hasty and should stick to its principles. The case centered on whether Louisiana's 2024 congressional map amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The Court's ruling could trigger new legal challenges over congressional boundaries.
- Jackson doubles down on criticism of fellow justices over Louisiana redistricting case: 'Be better'
Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized the Supreme Court's handling of a Louisiana gerrymandering case, stating that the Court should be apolitical and stick to its principles. The case centered on whether Louisiana's 2024 congressional map amounted to an unconstitutional racial gerrymander. The Supreme Court's ruling could trigger a new wave of legal challenges over congressional boundaries.
- Ketanji Brown Jackson says Supreme Court risks being seen as political after voting rights decision
Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson warned that the court's decision on voting rights may be seen as political, risking public confidence in the judiciary. The decision allowed Louisiana to use new maps after striking down a majority-Black district. Jackson dissented from the conservative-majority decision.
- Packing the Supreme Court? Kamala Harris pushes idea as the party quickly forgets about Joe Biden
Kamala Harris proposes expanding the Supreme Court, an idea previously attempted by FDR, to overcome conservative opposition and neutralize perceived red state cheating. The plan has been met with criticism from both parties. Harris also suggests re-examining the Electoral College and granting statehood to D.C. and Puerto Rico.
- Virginia’s Spanberger fumes after Supreme Court declines to reinstate new map
Virginia Governor Abigail Spanberger criticized the Supreme Court for declining to reinstate the state's new congressional map. The map was previously approved by voters but struck down by Virginia's high court. The decision nullifies an election and its votes.
- Harris labeled 'institutional arsonist' for plan to fundamentally transform SCOTUS and Electoral College
Former Vice President Kamala Harris faces backlash for suggesting Democrats consider expanding the Supreme Court and gutting the Electoral College. Republicans accuse her of being an 'institutional arsonist' for proposing such reforms. The debate comes ahead of the midterm elections, where Republicans are emerging as winners in the redistricting battle.
- Harris labeled 'institutional arsonist' for plan to fundamentally transform SCOTUS and Electoral College
Former Vice President Kamala Harris faced backlash from Republicans after suggesting Democrats consider expanding the Supreme Court and eliminating the Electoral College. Harris' comments came after Democrats suffered setbacks in redistricting wars. Republicans criticized her ideas as dangerous and outrageous.
- A “Scheme” Against Dobbs: SCOTUS Dissent Hints at Next Phase of Abortion Rights Fight
The Supreme Court ruled to continue telehealth access to abortion drug mifepristone, despite dissent from Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito. The decision allows access to continue, but advocates warn that the threat to abortion access is still present. Abortions have increased since the Dobbs v. Jackson decision in 2022.
- SCOTUS upholds abortion pill telehealth access. And, Trump returns from China visit
The Supreme Court upheld access to the abortion pill mifepristone via telehealth and Donald Trump returned from a state visit to China where he made multiple trade deals.
- SCOTUS upholds abortion pill telehealth access. And, Trump returns from China visit
The Supreme Court has upheld access to the abortion pill mifepristone via telehealth, and Donald Trump has returned from a state visit to China where he claims to have made multiple trade deals. The ruling on mifepristone ensures continued access to the medication. Trump's visit to China aimed to strengthen trade relations.