Ketanji Brown Jackson

Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's first date was with the man who would become her husband, though she initially did not recognize it as a date. The article highlights how future Supreme Court justices can overthink dating.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson discussed the importance of impartiality during a guest appearance on Michelle Obama's podcast, 'IMO,' but faced online criticism for the perceived irony of promoting neutrality while appearing on a platform associated with left-leaning views. Critics highlighted the contradiction, with some suggesting her statements lack credibility given the context.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson emphasized impartiality during a podcast appearance on Michelle Obama's 'IMO,' but faced online criticism for the perceived irony of discussing neutrality while appearing on a platform associated with left-leaning views. Critics highlighted the contradiction, with reactions including mockery and skepticism about her commitment to impartiality.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson supported Michelle Obama's critique of isolating students of color in elite colleges, citing Harvard's Black community as a positive example. Jackson described her experience at Harvard, where a sizable Black student population fostered a sense of belonging. The article also notes declining Black enrollment at Harvard following a 2023 Supreme Court ruling against race-conscious admissions.

Michelle Obama, the former first lady, and her brother Craig Robinson interviewed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson on their podcast. The discussion focused on work-life balance and public service.

Supreme Court justices have earned over $13 million collectively from book deals, raising ethical concerns due to limited scrutiny compared to other income sources like gifts or travel. Ethics rules permit writing income as part of outside earnings, but critics argue book revenue deserves greater oversight.

Justice Elena Kagan rejects claims that the Supreme Court is a 'rubber stamp' for President Trump, citing recent high-profile losses for Trump in cases like tariffs and birthright citizenship. An appeals court temporarily blocks the Trump administration from revoking deportation protections for Haitian migrants, and the Justice Department updates religious liberty protections to align with recent Supreme Court rulings.

Justice Elena Kagan stated the Supreme Court is not a rubber stamp for President Donald Trump, noting the court has checked the executive branch on issues like tariffs and birthright citizenship. While the court has largely supported Trump's policies, Kagan emphasized its independence and criticized perceptions of political bias.

Justice Elena Kagan stated the Supreme Court is not a puppet for President Donald Trump, despite its conservative leanings and numerous rulings in his favor. She highlighted cases where the court rejected Trump's policies, such as tariffs and birthright citizenship restrictions, emphasizing the court's role in checking the executive branch.

Justice Elena Kagan stated the Supreme Court is not a rubber stamp for President Donald Trump, citing rulings that rejected Trump's tariffs and birthright citizenship efforts. The court has generally aligned with Trump's policies but has checked the executive branch on key issues, according to Kagan.

Matt Damon admitted he was unaware that Supreme Court justice Ketanji Brown Jackson was his Harvard classmate. The revelation highlights an unexpected connection between the actor and the judge.

The article examines the complexity of labeling Supreme Court justices as 'ideological,' noting that judicial decisions often defy simple liberal-conservative divisions. It highlights cases like Trump v. Barbara and Chatrie v. United States, where majority coalitions included justices from different perceived ideological blocs, and discusses challenges in measuring ideology through emergency dockets.

The Supreme Court concludes its term, with increased ideological division in decisions noted by SCOTUSblog. The article highlights the gradual pace of constitutional law changes and the media's focus on the Court's impact on American citizens.

The Supreme Court justices handled significant emergency docket cases during last summer's recess, addressing requests from the Trump administration to reduce the federal workforce, terminate grants, and alter immigration enforcement. This activity led to tensions among justices, including public criticism from Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson, raising concerns about long-term effects on court dynamics.

Ketanji Brown Jackson invoked the 'dark stain of slavery' in a sharp rebuke of Clarence Thomas during a Supreme Court session. The exchange highlighted tensions between the justices.

The Supreme Court narrowly upheld birthright citizenship, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's opinion warning about the potential to rewrite history for political purposes. The ruling is described as a victory for democracy while highlighting concerns about historical accuracy.

The Supreme Court narrowly upheld birthright citizenship, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson's opinion warning about efforts to rewrite history for political purposes.

The 2025-26 Supreme Court term showed increased ideological division, with 28.8% of decisions split 6-3 along ideological lines, compared to 15.2% the previous term. The final week included deviations from the usual 6-3 pattern, including Trump v. Barbara, where all three liberal justices joined the majority. Other cases like West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Trump v. Slaughter followed predictable ideological splits.

The Supreme Court released three final opinions for the 2025-26 term, including striking down an executive order on birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara, upholding Title IX policies on sports teams in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, and ruling against campaign spending restrictions in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC. The decisions involved multiple justices with varying concurrences and dissents.

Supreme Court Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson criticized Justice Clarence Thomas for his dissent in a decision upholding birthright citizenship. Jackson argued Thomas applied a 'narrow vision' of the 14th Amendment and questioned his 'colorblind' Constitution stance.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment regardless of their parents' immigration status. The decision rejected President Donald Trump's executive order denying citizenship to children of undocumented or temporary residents, highlighting divisions among justices, including contrasting views between Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Clarence Thomas.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment regardless of their parents' immigration status, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump. The decision highlighted divisions among justices, including differing views between two Black justices and sharp disagreements over historical interpretations of the Citizenship Clause.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald J. Trump exceeded his authority by attempting to end birthright citizenship via executive order, upholding the 14th Amendment. The majority opinion, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, emphasized the constitutional right to citizenship, while dissenting justices argued the ruling expanded citizenship to include children of 'birth tourists.' Immigrant advocates highlighted the decision's importance for protecting children's rights and access to healthcare.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down federal limits on coordinated spending by political parties with candidates, citing First Amendment violations. The decision in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission overturned the 2001 Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee ruling. Justices Kavanaugh (majority) and Kagan (dissent) highlighted opposing views on free speech and democratic integrity.

The article highlights June 30 historical events, including Adolf Hitler's 1934 'Night of the Long Knives' purge of political rivals, Eugene V. Debs' 1918 arrest for anti-war speech, William Howard Taft's 1921 Supreme Court nomination, and recent events like Ketanji Brown Jackson's 2022 Supreme Court swearing-in.

Justice Sonia Sotomayor received $4,333 in Bad Bunny concert tickets from Rimas Entertainment during a 2025 trip to Puerto Rico, while Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson received a $2,500 painting for her chambers. Financial disclosures revealed teaching earnings, book royalties, and travel details for multiple justices in 2025.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not dismiss Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent limiting presidential authority over agency panels, with the majority asserting the FTC must be controlled by the executive branch. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, emphasizing the importance of agency independence.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received $4,333 in concert tickets for a Puerto Rico event last August, while other justices disclosed royalties from books and teaching income. Financial disclosure forms revealed Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson earned $1.81 million in book advances and Justice Amy Coney Barrett reported over $849,000 in royalties.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor received $4,333 in concert tickets from Rimas Entertainment, Bad Bunny's label, during a trip to Puerto Rico. Justices reported book royalties and teaching income, including $1.81 million for Ketanji Brown Jackson and $33,285 for Brett Kavanaugh. The disclosures highlight increased scrutiny of justices' financial activities and ethical practices.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that law enforcement requires warrants to access cellphone location history data under the Fourth Amendment. The decision centered on a 2019 Virginia credit union robbery case, where police obtained location data from a third-party tech company. The ruling leaves unresolved when such searches are deemed reasonable, with civil liberties advocates and states debating the implications of geofence warrants.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that states can count mail-in ballots arriving after Election Day, rejecting arguments from the Trump administration and Republican states. The decision, in RNC vs. Watson, upheld Mississippi's law allowing ballots postmarked by Election Day to be counted if received within five business days, with thirteen states having similar grace periods.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that law enforcement requires warrants to access cellphone location history data under the Fourth Amendment, citing privacy rights. The 6-3 decision centered on a Virginia bank robbery case, with Justice Elena Kagan writing the majority opinion. The ruling left unresolved questions about the reasonableness of geofence warrants, which allow police to track phones in specific geographic areas.

Supreme Court justices disclosed over $2 million in 2025 book deal earnings, with Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson receiving a $1.2 million advance. Gifts included concert tickets and a painting commission, while advocates criticized the ethical implications of justices earning millions from books.

Supreme Court financial disclosure forms reveal Justice Sonia Sotomayor received $4,333 in concert tickets from Rimas Entertainment during a trip to Puerto Rico, while other justices disclosed book royalties and teaching income. The forms highlight ongoing scrutiny of justices' off-bench activities, including Justice Clarence Thomas's unreported luxury travel and book deals generating over $1 million for Justices Ketanji Brown Jackson and Amy Coney Barrett.

Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor attended a Puerto Rico concert gifted by Rimas Entertainment, while justices reported book royalties, teaching income, and travel. Financial disclosures revealed earnings from books, speaking engagements, and courses, with Justice Samuel Alito requesting an extension for his report.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that police need warrants to access cellphone location history data under the Fourth Amendment. The 6-3 decision centered on a 2019 Virginia credit union robbery case, with Justice Elena Kagan writing that individuals have a reasonable expectation of privacy in their cellphone location records. The ruling leaves unresolved questions about when such searches are considered reasonable.

The US Supreme Court ruled that Donald Trump can fire leaders of independent agencies, overturning 90 years of precedent. The decision in Trump v Slaughter was 6-3, with dissents from Justices Sotomayor, Jackson, and Kagan. The case involved Trump's 2025 firing of Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that Mississippi can count absentee ballots postmarked by Election Day but received up to five days later, overturning a federal appeals court decision. The majority opinion, authored by Justice Amy Coney Barrett, held that federal election-day statutes do not require ballots to be received by Election Day. The dissent, led by Justice Samuel Alito, opposed the decision, which follows a challenge to Mississippi’s voting laws by President Donald Trump’s administration.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 7-2 that state courts cannot hold Monsanto liable for labeling issues in pesticides like Roundup, as federal law preempts such claims. The decision dismissed a $1.25 million verdict awarded to a man who claimed Roundup caused his cancer, with justices citing compliance with EPA regulations. The ruling split the court, with Justice Brett Kavanaugh writing the majority and Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson dissenting.

The Supreme Court struck down Hawaii's private-property concealed-carry restriction in a 6-3 decision, criticizing the state's use of a Reconstruction-era Black Code to justify the law. Attorney Kevin O'Grady, representing plaintiffs, condemned Hawaii's reliance on the 1865 Louisiana statute, calling it a 'tainted artifact' designed to disarm newly freed Black Americans. The ruling rejected the Black Code as a valid legal precedent under the Second Amendment.