John Roberts

The article examines the complexity of labeling Supreme Court justices as 'ideological,' noting that judicial decisions often defy simple liberal-conservative divisions. It highlights cases like Trump v. Barbara and Chatrie v. United States, where majority coalitions included justices from different perceived ideological blocs, and discusses challenges in measuring ideology through emergency dockets.

President Donald Trump will ask the Supreme Court to rehear the birthright citizenship case, calling the decision 'insane.' The Court's 6-3 ruling upheld citizenship for children of illegal immigrants, and Trump claims it's being exploited for profit. House Speaker Mike Johnson says Republicans are considering legislative action.

President Donald Trump plans to request the Supreme Court rehear a birthright citizenship case after the court upheld the policy, which grants citizenship to children born in the U.S. regardless of parental immigration status. Trump criticized the decision as 'insane' and claimed it enables financial exploitation through border advertisements offering 'birthright citizenship' services. The court's 6-3 ruling affirmed the 14th Amendment's application to all children born on U.S. soil, and Republicans are exploring legislative efforts to address the issue.

The article analyzes Chief Justice John Roberts' evolving role on the Supreme Court, noting his transition from a swing justice before 2020 to a moderate dissenter (2020-2022) and a 'moderator from the front' since 2023. It cites cases like the 2012 Affordable Care Act decision and the 2019 census case to illustrate his shifting approach, balancing conservative principles with institutional stability.

The Supreme Court's recent decisions challenge leftist claims of a conservative agenda aligned with Donald Trump, showing rulings that prioritize constitutional principles over political interests. Democratic leaders criticize the Court for favoring Trump, but the article argues the Court's actions reflect long-term constitutional goals rather than partisan policies.

The Supreme Court concludes its term, with increased ideological division in decisions noted by SCOTUSblog. The article highlights the gradual pace of constitutional law changes and the media's focus on the Court's impact on American citizens.

John Roberts, the US chief justice, has led the Supreme Court in actions that both defied Trump and expanded presidential power. The court's decisions under his leadership reflect a balance between resisting executive overreach and affirming presidential authority in specific contexts.

The Supreme Court declined to halt an $800-a-day fine against former Fox News reporter Catherine Herridge for refusing to reveal her source in a lawsuit involving scientist Yanping Chen. The Court also ruled that President Donald Trump cannot fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook while her challenge to her removal is ongoing, but he may attempt to fire her again under new circumstances.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment in Trump v. Barbara, rejecting arguments that it enables exploitation. The decision emphasized historical intent, while dissenting justices raised concerns about modern implications. The article highlights the economic and societal contributions of immigrant descendants, including their roles in business, government, and the military.

The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment in Trump v. Barbara, a decision criticized as one of the court's worst. The ruling mandates citizenship for anyone born on U.S. soil, regardless of parents' immigration status or intentions, sparking concerns about national security and the definition of American identity.

Chief Justice John Roberts managed an unruly Supreme Court during a tumultuous term, as noted in a recent report.

Justice Amy Coney Barrett faces backlash from conservative lawmakers and pundits after voting to uphold birthright citizenship, which undermines President Trump’s immigration agenda. She joined Chief Justice John Roberts, Justice Brett Kavanaugh, and the court’s liberal justices in striking down Trump’s executive order.

The Supreme Court released two rulings—Trump v. Slaughter and Trump v. Cook—simultaneously to avoid uncertainty about the Federal Reserve’s independence, as the cases addressed limits on President Trump’s influence over federal agencies and the central bank. The Court expanded presidential authority over regulatory boards but protected the Fed’s independence, with Chief Justice Roberts emphasizing the need to avoid public doubt about the institution’s stability.

The 2025-26 Supreme Court term showed increased ideological division, with 28.8% of decisions split 6-3 along ideological lines, compared to 15.2% the previous term. The final week included deviations from the usual 6-3 pattern, including Trump v. Barbara, where all three liberal justices joined the majority. Other cases like West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Trump v. Slaughter followed predictable ideological splits.

The Supreme Court released three final opinions for the 2025-26 term, including striking down an executive order on birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara, upholding Title IX policies on sports teams in West Virginia v. B.P.J. and Little v. Hecox, and ruling against campaign spending restrictions in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. FEC. The decisions involved multiple justices with varying concurrences and dissents.

The US Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s attempt to restrict birthright citizenship, upholding the 14th Amendment’s Citizenship Clause. The 6-3 ruling maintained automatic citizenship for nearly all children born in the US, including those of undocumented parents. Trump criticized the decision and called on Congress to address birthright citizenship.

NPR retracted a false report claiming Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito was retiring after a misheard announcement by legal affairs correspondent Nina Totenberg. Totenberg apologized for the error, and sources confirmed Alito is not retiring this term.

NPR retracted an article mistakenly reporting Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's retirement due to a misunderstanding of Chief Justice John Roberts' statement. The error by reporter Nina Totenberg led to an apology and explanation, with the story being retracted after being posted live briefly.

NPR retracted an article falsely reporting Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito's retirement, attributed to a misunderstanding of Chief Justice John Roberts' statement by reporter Nina Totenberg. The error was quickly corrected, with apologies from NPR's leadership and an explanation from its public editor.

Norman Wong, great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, praised the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision upholding birthright citizenship under the Fourteenth Amendment, rejecting President Donald Trump's executive order restricting citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. The ruling reaffirmed the 1898 precedent established by Wong Kim Ark's case, which secured U.S. citizenship for those born domestically regardless of parental status.

The great-grandson of Wong Kim Ark, Norman Wong, praised the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision upholding birthright citizenship, rejecting President Trump's executive order. The ruling reaffirmed the Fourteenth Amendment's guarantee of citizenship for anyone born in the U.S., with Chief Justice John Roberts leading the majority. Trump criticized the decision, while dissenting justices argued the amendment was misinterpreted.

The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in a 6-3 ruling, blocking an executive order from President Donald Trump that sought to deny citizenship to children born to parents in the U.S. illegally or on temporary visas. The decision affirmed the 14th Amendment's guarantee of citizenship to nearly all U.S.-born children, with dissenting justices including Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito, and Neil Gorsuch.

NPR erroneously published a report claiming Supreme Court Justice Samuel Alito had retired, later retracted it after the Court denied the claim. The error stemmed from reporter Nina Totenberg mishearing a statement and using a prewritten story, which included a typo. The mistake caused widespread retraction efforts and amplified media chaos during a busy ruling day.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that children born in the U.S. are citizens under the Fourteenth Amendment regardless of their parents' immigration status, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump. The decision highlighted divisions among justices, including differing views between two Black justices and sharp disagreements over historical interpretations of the Citizenship Clause.

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s executive order banning birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants and some temporary visitors, ruling it unconstitutional under the 14th Amendment. The 6-3 decision reaffirmed that the 14th Amendment automatically grants citizenship to anyone born in the U.S., with Chief Justice John Roberts emphasizing the Framers’ intent. Three conservative justices and President Trump disputed the ruling, arguing the Amendment was intended only for freed black slaves.

Chief Justice John Roberts overturned the 1935 Supreme Court decision Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which allowed Congress to create independent agencies with members protected from presidential removal. The article argues that Humphrey’s was grounded in originalist constitutional principles but was rejected in favor of a 1926 decision (Myers v. United States) that emphasized broader presidential removal authority.

NPR retracted an article falsely reporting that Justice Samuel Alito was retiring, attributing the error to a misunderstanding. The report by Nina Totenberg was quickly removed after the Supreme Court's public information office denied the claim, and NPR issued an apology for the confusion.

A majority of Supreme Court justices upheld birthright citizenship, citing the 14th Amendment as enshrining jus soli. Chief Justice John Roberts and conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett joined three liberal justices to strike down President Trump’s executive order attempting to limit birthright citizenship.

The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter that presidents can remove members of independent regulatory agencies like the FTC without cause, overturning a 1935 precedent. The decision reinforces the 'unitary executive theory,' asserting presidential control over all executive power. Two FTC commissioners, Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, were fired by Trump without allegations of misconduct.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to redefine the constitutional right. A majority of justices, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, ruled the order violated the 14th Amendment. Six justices agreed with the majority, while three dissented, with some arguing Congress could legislate exceptions to birthright citizenship.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to redefine the constitutional right. A majority of justices, led by Chief Justice John G. Roberts, ruled the order violated the 14th Amendment, while conservative justices dissented. Trump urged Congress to codify his policy, but the decision emphasized that any change to birthright citizenship would require a constitutional amendment.

The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship, rejecting President Donald Trump’s executive order that sought to exclude children of undocumented immigrants and temporary visitors from citizenship. The ruling relied on the 14th Amendment and recent federal laws, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion. Three conservative justices, including Clarence Thomas, dissented, arguing the order should be allowed to take effect.

The Supreme Court struck down President Trump’s birthright citizenship restrictions, ruling the policy unconstitutional. The majority, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, included three liberal justices and conservative Justice Amy Coney Barrett, while Justice Clarence Thomas dissented.

The article outlines perks of being a Supreme Court justice, including a salary over $300,000, lifetime job security, and a private basketball court. It notes low public favorability toward the Court and political tensions with President Donald Trump, who has experienced mixed rulings from the justices.

The Supreme Court struck down President Donald Trump’s executive order aiming to end birthright citizenship, ruling it incompatible with the 14th Amendment. Chief Justice John Roberts emphasized that children born to parents unlawfully or temporarily present in the U.S. satisfy the Citizenship Clause. Justice Samuel Alito dissented, arguing the 14th Amendment only grants citizenship to children whose allegiance is solely to the U.S.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump’s birthright citizenship restrictions are unconstitutional, stating the 14th Amendment guarantees automatic citizenship for nearly all children born on U.S. soil. Chief Justice John Roberts, joined by three liberal justices and Justice Amy Coney Barrett, authored the decision.

The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in a 6-3 decision, rejecting President Trump's executive order that sought to deny citizenship to children born in the U.S. to undocumented immigrants or temporary visa holders. The ruling cited the Fourteenth Amendment and the 1898 Wong Kim Ark case, which established birthright citizenship for all children born in the U.S. except for those of foreign diplomats.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump’s birthright citizenship restrictions are unconstitutional, stating the 14th Amendment guarantees automatic citizenship for nearly all children born on U.S. soil. Chief Justice John Roberts and three liberal justices, along with Justice Amy Coney Barrett, supported the decision.

The Supreme Court announced its final four cases for the term, including Trump v. Barbara (birthright citizenship) and cases on transgender athletes and campaign finance. On Monday, the court issued rulings in four cases, including decisions on the FTC’s for-cause removal provision, the removal of a Federal Reserve Governor, mail-in ballot deadlines, and cellphone location privacy. Additional cases were added to the 2026-27 term docket.

The Supreme Court will rule on the constitutionality of President Donald Trump’s order challenging birthright citizenship for children of undocumented immigrants. The decision is part of a term where the court has largely supported Trump’s claims of presidential power, including upholding his authority to fire federal agency heads. Most countries outside the Americas use jus sanguinis for citizenship, while the U.S. follows English common law’s jus soli.