Genalo v. Black
Coverage of Genalo v. Black in the Nexus archive.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a case involving the prolonged detention of a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic by ICE, who was held for 21 months after an assault conviction. An appeals court previously ruled that unreasonably prolonged detention requires a bond hearing with 'clear and convincing evidence' from the government. The Supreme Court also questioned whether the immigrant's 2020 release renders the case moot.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court will review a case involving the prolonged detention of noncitizens with criminal records and whether they are entitled to a bond hearing. The case, Genalo v. Black, centers on a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months after an assault conviction. An appeals court previously ruled that unreasonably prolonged detention requires a bond hearing with 'clear and convincing evidence' from the government.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a case (Genalo v. Black) involving a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months after an assault conviction, with an appeals court ruling that prolonged detention requires a bond hearing. The Court is also considering whether the immigrant's 2020 release makes the case moot.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court will review a case involving the prolonged detention of noncitizens with criminal records, specifically Genalo v. Black, which concerns a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months without a bond hearing. The case centers on whether such detainees are entitled to bond hearings to assess flight risk or community danger.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to review a case involving the prolonged detention of immigrants with criminal records, specifically Genalo v. Black, which concerns a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months after an assault conviction. An appeals court previously ruled that unreasonably prolonged detention requires a bond hearing where the government must demonstrate the individual is a flight risk or danger to the community.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court will review a case involving the prolonged detention of noncitizens with criminal records, specifically whether they are entitled to bond hearings. The case, Genalo v. Black, centers on a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months after an assault conviction. The court also questioned if the immigrant’s 2020 release renders the case moot.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court agreed to review a case involving the prolonged detention of noncitizens by ICE, specifically legal immigrant Genalo from the Dominican Republic, who was detained for 21 months after an assault conviction. An appeals court previously ruled that 'unreasonably prolonged' detention requires a bond hearing, but the Supreme Court questioned if the immigrant's 2020 release rendered the case moot.
- Court agrees to hear three new cases, including on the constitutionality of six-person juries
The Supreme Court agreed to hear three new cases, including one challenging the constitutionality of Florida’s six-person juries and another involving detention hearings for noncitizens in immigration custody. The cases include Genalo v. Black, which questions when noncitizen detention becomes unreasonably prolonged, and Hamed Kian’s appeal of a conviction by a six-person jury. The court also addressed post-conviction relief standards.
- A random assortment of relists: prolonged detention, confessions of error, small juries, and new rules on habeas
The Supreme Court addressed multiple relisted cases, including a summary reversal in a death-row inmate's case due to improper post-trial DNA evidence consideration, granted review in a First Step Act habeas corpus case, and denied petitions in immigration detention and state tax disputes. Justice Thomas dissented in several cases, arguing over procedural and jurisdictional issues.