Federal Trade Commission

The article discusses the Federal Communications Commission's investigation into The View for potential violations of the 'equal time' rule by hosting political candidates, and the Supreme Court's ruling in Trump v. Slaughter, which expanded presidential power to dismiss officials from independent regulatory agencies. The ruling is seen as increasing partisan influence over government functions affecting everyday life.

Kroger, an Ohio-based grocery chain, announced a $1.65 billion deal to acquire Giant Eagle, a Pennsylvania-based retailer with over 200 locations. The acquisition requires federal approval and may involve closing or selling some overlapping stores. Analysts express mixed views, noting potential efficiencies for consumers but concerns about reduced competition and impacts on workers and small businesses.

The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter that protections preventing the president from removing independent agency commissioners violate the Constitution’s separation of powers. The decision challenges the independence of agencies like the Federal Trade Commission, which previously shielded commissioners from presidential removal, and shifts executive power toward the president.

The Federal Trade Commission warns that scammers are targeting individuals previously victimized by fraud, using fake recovery offers and agency badges to extract more money. The Identity Theft Resource Center's 2026 report highlights that 25.6% of identity crime victims manage multiple incidents, while 62.1% of attempted identity misuse involves new account applications. Scammers maintain 'sucker lists' of victim data, enabling repeat targeting, and stolen Social Security numbers remain vulnerable to long-term fraud due to their irreplaceable nature.

The Justice Department urged states to investigate potential gas price gouging by oil companies and individuals amid complaints from President Trump about slow price declines. Associate Attorney General Stanley Woodward Jr. and FTC Chair Andrew Ferguson sent the message to state attorneys general.

A Mesa woman's Medicaid coverage was jeopardized after someone used her Social Security number to report fake income from an oil field job in Texas. Corina, who has been on disability since 1999, filed police and federal reports but struggled with bureaucratic hurdles to prove her identity theft until media intervention secured her benefits.

Corina, a Mesa woman on disability since 1999, faced potential loss of Medicaid coverage after someone used her Social Security number to falsely report employment in Texas. She filed reports with authorities and the Arizona Department of Economic Security but struggled to resolve the issue until media intervention secured her coverage. Experts highlighted the risks of employment identity theft, including tax and benefits complications.

The Supreme Court's recent term prioritized expanding its own power and that of the presidency over Congress, sidelining legislative authority in cases involving regulatory independence, political spending, and voting rights. Key decisions included limiting Congress' ability to protect voting districts and allowing the president to withhold foreign aid, while critics argue the court increasingly acts as a 'line-item veto' for laws it dislikes.

Two House bills in Michigan aim to ban 'surveillance pricing,' a practice where companies use consumer data to set different prices for the same product. The bills, which passed the House and advanced to the Senate, target e-commerce sellers using location and browsing history for pricing. Similar legislation was introduced in the Senate by Democratic lawmakers.

Chief Justice John Roberts overturned the 1935 Supreme Court decision Humphrey’s Executor v. United States, which allowed Congress to create independent agencies with members protected from presidential removal. The article argues that Humphrey’s was grounded in originalist constitutional principles but was rejected in favor of a 1926 decision (Myers v. United States) that emphasized broader presidential removal authority.

The Supreme Court ruled in Trump v. Slaughter that presidents can remove members of independent regulatory agencies like the FTC without cause, overturning a 1935 precedent. The decision reinforces the 'unitary executive theory,' asserting presidential control over all executive power. Two FTC commissioners, Rebecca Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya, were fired by Trump without allegations of misconduct.

American technology and companies are being exploited to enable global scams, with AI tools like OpenAI’s ChatGPT and Google’s Gemini used in Southeast Asian scam operations. U.S. internet service providers, including Cogent Communications, Oracle, and AT&T, are involved in carrying traffic from scam centers linked to sanctioned entities in Myanmar. The Federal Trade Commission estimates Americans lost nearly $200 billion to such fraud in 2024.

The Supreme Court announced its final four cases for the term, including Trump v. Barbara (birthright citizenship) and cases on transgender athletes and campaign finance. On Monday, the court issued rulings in four cases, including decisions on the FTC’s for-cause removal provision, the removal of a Federal Reserve Governor, mail-in ballot deadlines, and cellphone location privacy. Additional cases were added to the 2026-27 term docket.

The US Supreme Court granted Donald Trump and future presidents the power to fire leaders of independent agencies, overturning a 90-year precedent. The court also ruled against Trump's administration on mail-in ballots, allowing them to be counted after election day, and mandated privacy protections for smartphone location data. Additionally, the court affirmed a jury's verdict against Trump in a case involving E. Jean Carroll.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not fire Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned part of a 1935 precedent, expanding presidential authority over agency panels while preserving removal protections for some independent bodies. The ruling split the court along ideological lines, with Chief Justice John Roberts writing the majority opinion and Justices Sotomayor, Kagan, and Jackson dissenting.

The Supreme Court expanded President Trump's control over federal agencies, including immigration and the Federal Trade Commission, but limited his authority over the Federal Reserve and tariffs. These rulings increased regulatory uncertainty for businesses while preserving some market stability.

The Supreme Court ruled that Trump can fire Federal Trade Commission members, potentially enabling him to dismantle the Deep State.

The Supreme Court ruled 5-4 that President Trump cannot fire Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook without due process, while a separate 6-3 decision granted him authority to remove leaders of other independent agencies. The rulings created a 'Federal Reserve exception' to presidential power, allowing Trump to reshape regulatory bodies like the Federal Trade Commission.

The Supreme Court issued split decisions on presidential authority over federal agencies, preventing President Trump from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook but expanding his power to dismiss leaders of other independent agencies. The rulings overturned a 1935 precedent and allowed Trump to remove Federal Trade Commission member Rebecca Slaughter, with the court creating a Federal Reserve exception to presidential removal power.

The Supreme Court issued two rulings on presidential authority over federal agencies: a 5-4 decision preventing President Trump from removing Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook without notice, and a 6-3 decision granting him power to remove leaders of other independent agencies, overturning a 1935 precedent. Trump celebrated the latter ruling, stating it expanded presidential power.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not dismiss Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent limiting presidential authority over agency panels, with the majority asserting the FTC must be controlled by the executive branch. Justices Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan, and Ketanji Brown Jackson dissented, emphasizing the importance of agency independence.

A Senate draft bill proposed by Sen. Mark Warner aims to establish a federally vetted list of AI agent providers to ensure security and accountability on online platforms. The AI AGENT Act would require the FTC to certify providers that meet privacy and data security standards, link AI agents to human operators, and allow users to control permissions. The bill seeks to address risks like unreliable AI purchases and data leaks as agentic AI becomes more prevalent.

The Supreme Court issued rulings on the Federal Reserve and Federal Trade Commission with significant implications for consumer household finances. The decisions are described as having far-reaching effects.

Cyber fraudsters use AI and stolen data to trick victims into authorizing fund transfers, with organized groups like nation-state actors and criminal gangs driving the rise in scams. The Federal Trade Commission reports Americans lost $16 billion to fraud in 2025, including $3.5 billion from imposter scams targeting bank customers.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not fire Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent, asserting that agencies exercising executive power must be controlled by the president, while dissenting justices emphasized the importance of agency independence.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not dismiss Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor v. United States ruling, asserting that agencies exercising executive power must be controlled by the president.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned most of the 1935 Humphrey’s Executor decision, allowing presidents greater authority to remove leaders of independent federal agencies. The 6-3 ruling, prompted by President Donald Trump’s dismissal of Rebecca Slaughter from the FTC, asserts that restrictions on presidential removal of agency officials violate constitutional principles of executive accountability.

The U.S. Supreme Court allowed President Trump to remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but blocked his attempt to fire Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The 6-3 decision overturned a 1935 precedent, expanding presidential authority over agency panels but affirming limits on removing Federal Reserve members.

The Supreme Court, in a 6-3 decision, strengthened President Trump's control over independent agencies by overruling a 91-year precedent, allowing him to dismiss Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter, a Democratic appointee.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but not Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent limiting presidential removal power over agency appointees, with Chief Justice John Roberts arguing the Federal Trade Commission exercises executive power requiring presidential control. Three liberal justices dissented, warning the ruling undermines agency independence.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could fire Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not remove Lisa Cook from the Federal Reserve Board. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent, expanding presidential authority over agency panels while preserving limits on removing Federal Reserve members. The ruling split along ideological lines, with the majority emphasizing executive control over agencies exercising executive power and dissenters warning of reduced independence for regulatory bodies.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Donald Trump could remove Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Slaughter but could not dismiss Federal Reserve Board member Lisa Cook. The decision overturned a 1935 precedent limiting presidential removal power, expanding executive authority over agency panels. Justices split along ideological lines, with the majority asserting the FTC must be controlled by the president due to its exercise of executive power.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 91-year-old precedent that limited presidential authority to remove members of independent agencies, ruling in a 6-3 decision that President Trump's 2025 firing of Federal Trade Commissioner Rebecca Kelly Slaughter without cause was lawful. The ruling, which weakened the 1935 Humphrey's Executor case, expanded presidential control over agencies like the FTC, which were previously considered checks on executive power.

The Supreme Court allowed President Trump to remove a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission for policy reasons. This action rolled back 90 years of precedent.

The Supreme Court allowed Federal Reserve governor Lisa Cook to remain in her position while challenging President Donald Trump's attempt to fire her but upheld his removal of heads of other independent federal agencies. The ruling expanded presidential power by overturning a 91-year-old decision that limited removal authority for agency board members, with six conservative justices in the majority and Justice Sonia Sotomayor dissenting.

The Supreme Court ruled that presidents can fire heads of independent federal agencies without cause, except for the Federal Reserve, allowing President Donald Trump to remove Rebecca Slaughter from the Federal Trade Commission but blocking his attempt to fire Fed Governor Lisa Cook. The 6-3 decision, led by Chief Justice John Roberts, overturned a 91-year-old precedent to expand executive power, with dissenting Justice Sonia Sotomayor warning of potential risks.

The Supreme Court ruled that President Trump could fire heads of independent federal agencies without cause, except for Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook, whom the court allowed to remain in her position during her legal challenge. The decision overturned a 91-year-old precedent limiting presidential removal power, asserting constitutional separation of powers.

The Supreme Court allowed Federal Reserve Governor Lisa Cook to remain in her position while her legal challenge against President Donald Trump's attempt to fire her proceeds, but upheld Trump's removal of heads of other independent federal agencies. The decision expanded presidential authority to dismiss agency leaders without cause, overturning a 91-year-old precedent that limited such power.

The Supreme Court allowed the president to fire a Democratic member of the Federal Trade Commission, striking down a nearly century-old precedent intended to insulate independent agencies from political influence by the executive.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that President Trump could fire Federal Trade Commission members without cause, striking down a law requiring specific grounds for removal. The decision overruled a 1935 precedent and expanded presidential authority over executive branch agencies. Rebecca Slaughter, an FTC commissioner, challenged her firing by Trump, which lacked cited legal justification.