Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Dred Scott v. Sandford

Coverage of Dred Scott v. Sandford in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jun 17 · 12:50 UTCMost recent: Jul 18 · 19:08 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Recent coverage
  • POLITICSJul 18 · 19:08 UTCFOX NEWS
    Liberal circuit judge blasts SCOTUS conservatives, says Hawaii will defy high court

    A Hawaii Supreme Court justice criticized the U.S. Supreme Court for weakening constitutional rights and advancing a political agenda, arguing Hawaii's Constitution provides stronger protections. Justice Todd Eddins delivered the critique in a ruling overturning a 1990 conviction due to discredited evidence, comparing the Roberts Court's approach to discredited precedents like Dred Scott and Plessy.

  • POLITICSJul 18 · 19:08 UTCFOX NEWS POLITICS
    Liberal circuit judge blasts SCOTUS conservatives, says Hawaii will defy high court

    A Hawaii Supreme Court justice criticized the U.S. Supreme Court in a legal opinion, arguing that the Roberts Court has weakened constitutional rights and that Hawaii's Constitution should not follow its interpretations. The case involved overturning a conviction due to discredited evidence, with the justice comparing SCOTUS's approach to past decisions like Dred Scott and Plessy.

  • POLITICSJul 2 · 09:00 UTCFOX NEWS
    MORNING GLORY: Celebrate the Supreme Court, our Constitution and America at 250

    The Supreme Court concluded its 2025-2027 term, with justices preparing for summer activities while celebrating America's 250th anniversary. The article reflects on the Court's role in upholding the Constitution despite past controversial decisions like Dred Scott and Korematsu, which have been reversed. It emphasizes the importance of institutional respect for the rule of law as the nation approaches its bicentennial.

  • POLITICSJun 30 · 14:35 UTCCOURTHOUSE NEWS
    Supreme Court won’t redefine American citizenship at Trump’s request

    The Supreme Court rejected President Donald Trump’s request to redefine American citizenship by limiting birthright rights for children of certain immigrants. The ruling upheld the 14th Amendment’s longstanding precedent, which grants citizenship to most individuals born in the U.S., including those with noncitizen parents, as affirmed in the 1898 case United States v. Wong Kim Ark.

  • POLITICSJun 17 · 12:50 UTCJUST SECURITY
    Jubilee Deferred: What Juneteenth Demands of America at 250

    Juneteenth commemorates the delayed emancipation of enslaved people in Texas in 1865, two years after the Emancipation Proclamation. The article argues that racial inequality in America persists due to an 'architecture of inequality' and calls for building an 'architecture of belonging' to achieve durable freedom and equity for Black Americans.

Dred Scott v. Sandford · Dossier · The Nexus