Case
Coverage of Case in the Nexus archive.
- Case And Keohokalole Ramp Up Their Spending In Advance Of August Primary
Case and Keohokalole raised and spent similar amounts in the last quarter ahead of the August primary, but Case has more remaining funds for the final campaign phase according to FEC filings.
- Kerala Forest Minister seeks report after tribal man threatens to kill himself over vehicle seizure
The Kerala Forest Minister has requested a report following a tribal man's threat to commit suicide over the seizure of his earth mover by the Forest department. The vehicle was confiscated four-and-a-half years ago in connection with a case.
- US Attorney Andrew Boutros in court Thursday over handling of case
A federal judge has ordered U.S. Attorney Andrew Boutros to court on Thursday to address his handling of a case. The article does not provide additional details about the case or the judge's reasoning.
- 'I have the best relationship with the Daily Mail - it has been everything to me. Why would anyone turn on the people who have helped their case the most?' In a profoundly moving interview, Stephen Lawrence's father breaks his silence and speaks his mind
Stephen Lawrence's father gives a rare interview, expressing strong gratitude toward the Daily Mail for its support in their case. He questions why anyone would criticize the publication, which he credits with being crucial to their cause.
- Businessman Boby Chemmanur apologises to actor for misconduct via social media post
Boby Chemmanur apologized to an actor via a social media post and requested the actor to withdraw the case.
- Colorado Supreme Court rules fired Circle K clerk's case can go to trial
The Colorado Supreme Court ruled that a case involving a former Circle K clerk can proceed to trial. The decision allows the legal matter to move forward after the clerk was fired.
- Supreme Court agrees to weigh in on case over rights of some in ‘prolonged’ ICE detention
The U.S. Supreme Court will review a case involving the prolonged detention of noncitizens with criminal records, specifically Genalo v. Black, which concerns a legal immigrant from the Dominican Republic detained for 21 months without a bond hearing. The case centers on whether such detainees are entitled to bond hearings to assess flight risk or community danger.
- Missing nuclear official's final words before vanishing with a gun revealed as case takes disturbing turn
A nuclear official's final words before disappearing with a gun have been revealed, and the case is taking a disturbing turn. The incident involves a missing individual and a weapon, raising concerns about security and the circumstances surrounding their disappearance.
- 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' still being challenged despite DOJ's vows to kill it
Two separate cases are challenging the administration's scuttled $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund', despite the DOJ stating the plan is not proceeding.
- Bang, Bang, Bang: Callais Kills Off the Voting Rights Act
The Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana v. Callais narrowed the interpretation of Section 2 of the Voting Rights Act, shifting its focus from practices causing minority vote dilution to intentional discrimination. The ruling, led by Justice Samuel Alito, challenges the 'results' test established by Congress in 1982, potentially weakening protections for minority voters. Louisiana redrew congressional districts to create two majority-Black districts, but the new map faced legal challenges over political motivations.
- When and why did complying with the Voting Rights Act become unconstitutional?
The article discusses the Supreme Court case Callais v. Louisiana, which impacted vote-dilution claims under the Voting Rights Act and raised questions about whether a new standard for racial gerrymandering under the Fourteenth Amendment was established. The decision, authored by Justice Samuel Alito, left uncertainty about whether intentional racial intent or mere predominance of race in redistricting constitutes a constitutional violation.
- Supreme Court rules on key Voting Rights Act rule as Republicans and Democrats wage redistricting war
The Supreme Court limited a key provision of the Voting Rights Act (VRA) in a 6-3 ruling, narrowing how states can consider race when drawing congressional maps. The decision, in Louisiana v. Callais, could reduce minority representation and trigger legal challenges, as it questions the long-term viability of Section 2 of the VRA and its protections against racial gerrymandering.
- Supreme Court rules on key Voting Rights Act rule as Republicans and Democrats wage redistricting war
The Supreme Court limited the scope of the Voting Rights Act's Section 2 in a 6-3 ruling, narrowing states' ability to use race in redistricting. The decision centers on Louisiana's 2024 congressional map, which created a second majority-Black district, and could impact minority representation and trigger legal challenges. Conservative justices suggested Section 2 might have a 'sunset period,' while the NAACP warned the ruling could destabilize voting maps nationwide.
- Supreme Court justices skeptically question both sides in geofence surveillance case
The Supreme Court questioned the constitutionality of geofence warrants during oral arguments in Chatrie v. The United States, a case involving location data obtained from Google in a 2019 bank robbery conviction. Justices from both conservative and liberal factions raised concerns about privacy, bulk data access, and the Fourth Amendment implications of such surveillance.
- Colorado’s latest Supreme Court loss adds to growing string of culture war defeats
Colorado's Supreme Court lost a key culture-war case involving a conversion therapy ban, which the court ruled violated the First Amendment. This marks the third major defeat for the state in recent years, with legal experts criticizing its approach to regulating speech and religion.
- This Sheriff Says His Department Eliminated Racial Bias. Data Shows Otherwise.
Sheriff Jerry Sheridan claims his department eliminated racial bias and complies with a 2013 court settlement, but data shows ongoing disparities against Latino drivers. Annual reports reveal persistent racial profiling in traffic stops, contradicting Sheridan's assertions and the settlement's requirements.