Federal Election Commission

The Supreme Court struck down a law limiting coordinated spending by political parties in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission, a decision criticized by Democrats and left-leaning groups as favoring donors and special interests. The author argues the ruling could strengthen political parties, reduce reliance on super PACs, and improve transparency in campaign finance.

The U.S. Supreme Court overturned a 50-year-old federal law limiting political party spending in coordination with candidates, expanding First Amendment protections for money in politics. The 6-3 decision benefits Republican candidates by enabling unlimited spending and coordination, potentially increasing TV ad spending in key midterm races like Maine’s Senate election.

The U.S. Supreme Court struck down federal limits on political parties' spending on federal candidates, allowing unlimited coordination between parties and candidates. The decision is seen as a Republican advantage in the 2026 Senate race between Jon Ossoff and Mike Collins in Georgia, with Republican committees holding significantly more funds than Democratic counterparts.

The Supreme Court ruled 6-3 to strike down federal limits on coordinated spending by political parties with candidates, citing First Amendment violations. The decision in National Republican Senatorial Committee v. Federal Election Commission overturned the 2001 Colorado Republican Federal Campaign Committee ruling. Justices Kavanaugh (majority) and Kagan (dissent) highlighted opposing views on free speech and democratic integrity.

The Supreme Court eliminated limits on political party spending in federal elections, reversing a 50-year-old law. A Republican-led lawsuit, including Vice President JD Vance, challenged these limits, which were previously upheld in 2001. The decision aligns with the 2010 Citizens United ruling and shifts campaign finance rules, allowing parties to spend freely in coordination with candidates.

The Supreme Court eliminated limits on political party spending in coordination with federal candidates, overturning a 50-year-old law. The decision followed a Republican-led lawsuit involving Vice President JD Vance and was influenced by the 2010 Citizens United ruling. The Federal Election Commission later ceased defending the law after President Donald Trump's second term began.

The Supreme Court eliminated federal limits on political party spending in coordination with candidates, following a Republican-led lawsuit including JD Vance. The decision overturns a 50-year-old law, aligning with the 2010 Citizens United ruling, and was supported by the Federal Election Commission under President Donald Trump's administration.

The Supreme Court eliminated limits on coordinated political party spending in federal elections, overturning a 50-year-old law. The decision, driven by a Republican-led lawsuit including Vice President JD Vance, expands spending rights previously limited to prevent circumvention of individual contribution caps.

The Supreme Court eliminated limits on political party spending in federal elections, overturning a 50-year-old law. A Republican-led lawsuit, including Vice President JD Vance, challenged these restrictions, which previously prevented large donors from bypassing contribution caps by funneling funds to parties. The decision aligns with the court's 2010 Citizens United ruling but reverses a 2001 precedent that upheld the spending limits.

The Supreme Court announced its final four cases for the term, including Trump v. Barbara (birthright citizenship) and cases on transgender athletes and campaign finance. On Monday, the court issued rulings in four cases, including decisions on the FTC’s for-cause removal provision, the removal of a Federal Reserve Governor, mail-in ballot deadlines, and cellphone location privacy. Additional cases were added to the 2026-27 term docket.

Jamie Davis, a Democrat, and Julia Letlow, a Republican, will face off in Louisiana’s November U.S. Senate race after winning their runoff elections. Letlow, an incumbent congresswoman with President Trump’s endorsement, raised $5.3 million in campaign funds, while Davis, who raised $1.2 million, is expected to receive increased financial support from national Democratic groups. Analysts suggest the race will likely reflect core party values in a predominantly Republican state.

Peter Oberacker, a Trump-backed Republican, won the GOP primary in New York’s 19th district, securing the nomination to challenge incumbent Rep. Josh Riley, D-N.Y., in the November general election. The district, a target for Republicans aiming to maintain House control, last elected a Republican in 2022. Oberacker, with a food business background, focuses on rural agriculture and energy cost issues.

Gov. JB Pritzker is hosting a Chicago fundraiser for Democratic Senate candidate James Talarico, who faces Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton in a high-stakes Senate race. Talarico raised $40.2 million in the primary, and the election is considered Democrats' best chance to win a Senate seat in Texas. The race follows a Texas Democratic walkout to Illinois to block GOP redistricting plans.

A political action committee accused of using AI in an ad without disclosure faces criticism from Bridget Brink, a congressional candidate, who claims the ad falsely links her to Donald Trump. The complaint alleges the ad manipulates Trump's video to show him with a portfolio featuring Brink, which was AI-generated. Brink's campaign linked the PAC to another group supporting her opponent, Matt Maasdam.

Two U.S. House races in Maryland suburbs near Washington, D.C., are among the most expensive congressional primaries in U.S. history, with outside groups spending $12.5 million and candidates spending $10.5 million. Candidates express concern over excessive spending, noting voters are confused by the volume of ads and questioning the necessity of such high campaign costs.

The Federal Election Commission is requiring Disgraced Eric Swalwell to return over $30,000 in general election donations or face potential audit and enforcement action. In a June 15 letter, the FEC warned his committee to refund the funds because he is no longer...

A record $48 million has been spent on U.S. House and Senate primaries by super PACs that delay donor disclosure until after elections, according to a POLITICO analysis. These groups exploit FEC deadlines to raise unlimited funds without revealing donors during critical election periods, with spending surpassing previous cycles by more than double compared to 2024 and tenfold compared to 2018.

Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico received approximately 50% of his $8.5 million in fundraising from out-of-state donors during the first quarter of 2026, compared to 25% for Republican nominee Ken Paxton, who raised $850,000. Talarico's campaign highlighted Texas roots while drawing major support from donors in New York and California, raising concerns about reliance on non-Texas interests.

The Senate GOP campaign arm filed a complaint with the FEC to investigate an Alaskan Senate candidate named Daniel J. Sullivan, who shares a name with Alaska Sen. Dan Sullivan (R). The complaint alleges potential confusion due to the shared name.

National Republicans are requesting the FEC investigate Dan J. Sullivan and Amber Lee over campaign finance allegations. The NRSC claims Lee provided unpaid consulting services to Sullivan's campaign, potentially violating federal contribution limits. The complaint alleges Lee extended credit outside standard business practices for political consultants.

An Alaska senator who is seeking gas money is spending donor funds at a French restaurant in Washington, D.C., and a hotel associated with the Bachelorette, according to FEC filings. The spending is highlighted in financial disclosures submitted to the Federal Election Commission.

Graham Platner, a Maine Senate candidate, faces scrutiny for accepting over $30,000 from lobbyists and executives at major corporations while campaigning against big tech, pharmaceuticals, banks, and defense contractors. Despite pledging to reject contributions over $200 from healthcare industry lobbyists, Platner received $1,000 donations from lobbyists representing AbbVie, Novartis, and Moderna prior to making the pledge.

A campaign-finance watchdog group reported that a super PAC aligned with Republican U.S. Rep. Jim Jordan received a $250,000 contribution from GEO Group, a private prison company, following Jordan's vote for a bill that expanded ICE's budget and detention capacity. The Federal Election Commission was notified of the 'dark money' contribution, which occurred 11 days after the bill's passage.

Rep. Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) filed paperwork with the Federal Election Commission for the 2028 House race, signaling a potential political comeback after losing his 2024 primary to a Trump-backed challenger. He stated the filing allows him to raise funds for future campaign efforts.

Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick donated $5 million to the House GOP super PAC Congressional Leadership Fund on April 1, ahead of his congressional testimony about ties to Jeffrey Epstein, according to FEC filings. The donation occurred as he faced scrutiny over his connections to the convicted sex offender.

A crypto-backed hybrid PAC supported by Anchorage and Chainlink has announced endorsements for the 2026 midterm elections. According to FEC filings, the PAC has raised $175,000 in contributions and plans to influence US voters through media buys in several states.

The article discusses key races in 2026, with no further information provided. The content appears to be a placeholder or an incomplete article. No specific details are given about the races or their context.

Congress is rushing to regulate online prediction markets due to alleged insider trading scandals, with over a dozen bills introduced this year, including one by Rep. Ritchie Torres that bans using campaign funds for betting. The bills aim to prevent illicit activities and ensure transparency. However, the chances of becoming law are low due to resistance from the Trump administration.

A mysterious group spent $5 million on TV ads in the Michigan Senate primary, sparking suspicions of involvement by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee or its super PAC affiliate. The true source of the ad campaign may not be known for months due to Federal Election Commission rules. Front groups are proliferating in the 2026 election cycle, with various industries using loopholes to obscure their identity.

A mystery group spent $5 million on TV ads in the Michigan Senate primary, sparking suspicions of involvement by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee or its super PAC affiliate. The group's true source of funding may not be known for months due to Federal Election Commission rules. This is an example of how special interest groups are using loopholes to obscure their identity and influence elections.

Democrats spent $64 million to redraw Virginia's congressional map, but the effort failed after the Virginia Supreme Court invalidated the process due to a procedural constitutional violation. The Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee is confident in their ability to take back the majority despite being outspent by Republicans. The GOP has a significant cash advantage, with nearly $1 billion on hand compared to the Democrats' $550 million.

The article discusses how campaign contributions can become a crime when prosecutors criminalize politics, threatening democracy. This raises concerns about the impact on democratic processes. The issue highlights the need for clarity in campaign finance laws.

Senator Bernie Sanders' campaign used funds to pay for a Netflix subscription despite his criticism of the company's tax practices. Sanders has repeatedly criticized Netflix for allegedly not paying its fair share of taxes and raising prices on consumers. The senator's campaign paid $46.79 a month for the subscription from January to March.

Senator Bernie Sanders' campaign used funds to pay for a Netflix subscription despite his criticism of the company's tax practices. Sanders has repeatedly criticized Netflix for allegedly not paying its fair share of taxes and raising prices on consumers. The senator's campaign paid $46.79 a month for the subscription from January to March.

Senator Jon Ossoff is facing scrutiny for his ties to the Southern Poverty Law Center, which was indicted for alleged financial crimes and has contributed over $700,000 to his campaign. The SPLC allegedly defrauded donors by secretly transferring money to extremist groups. Ossoff has endorsed the group's efforts to combat racism.

Voter data can be used against individuals by cross-referencing public records and social media posts, allowing foreign intelligence services, employers, and identity fraud rings to identify and target specific people. Research has shown that most of the US population can be identified with just three anonymous data points. This information can be combined with other data sets to make identification easier.

Rep. Cory Mills, a Florida Republican facing allegations of sexual misconduct and campaign finance violations, has drawn a GOP challenger, Ryan Elijah, in his re-election bid. The House Ethics Committee is investigating Mills, whose re-election campaign is struggling financially and politically.

Rep. Cory Mills, a Florida Republican facing sexual misconduct allegations and a House Ethics Committee investigation, has drawn a GOP primary challenger, Ryan Elijah, a former FOX 35 Orlando news anchor. Mills, who denies wrongdoing and is endorsed by Donald Trump, faces financial struggles and a downgraded race outlook, with Democrats targeting his seat as a key flip opportunity.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, a Florida Democrat, announced her resignation from Congress amid a Republican-led effort to expel her over allegations of misusing federal disaster relief funds and a 15-count federal indictment. The House Ethics Committee found 'clear and convincing evidence' of misconduct, while she denies wrongdoing and plans to run for re-election despite low fundraising.

Rep. Sheila Cherfilus-McCormick, D-Fla., announced her resignation from Congress amid a Republican-led expulsion effort over allegations of misusing federal disaster relief funds. She faces a 15-count federal indictment and a House Ethics Committee finding of misconduct, though she denies wrongdoing and plans to run for re-election.