Anti-Weaponization fund

Sens. John Cornyn and Thom Tillis are engaging with the Trump administration to resolve concerns over attorney general nominee Todd Blanche's controversial IRS settlement agreement. The White House is actively seeking their support for Blanche's confirmation amid bipartisan criticism of a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' outlined in the agreement.

A Justice Department attorney asked a court to dismiss a lawsuit challenging the Trump administration’s anti-weaponization fund, arguing the fund is non-operational and no money has been transferred. The lawsuit, led by Andrew Floyd and organizations like National Abortion Federation, alleges the fund could enable payouts to individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot. Judge Leonie Brinkema has blocked the fund but awaits declarations from officials denying its implementation.

Texas Sen. John Cornyn appears uncertain about Todd Blanche’s nomination to be Trump’s attorney general. Cornyn raised concerns during Blanche’s confirmation hearing about President Trump’s 'anti-weaponization fund,' which Blanche helped develop as Trump’s personal lawyer.

Todd Blanche, interim attorney general, admitted during his confirmation hearing that he previously served as President Trump's lawyer, raising concerns about his loyalty to the administration over the Constitution. Blanche's leadership at the Justice Department has included weak criminal cases against Trump's critics and an agreement to halt IRS audits of Trump, reflecting a perceived alignment with Trump's interests.

Sen. Thom Tillis stated his vote to confirm Todd Blanche as attorney general depends on Blanche meeting with victims of Jeffery Epstein, a convicted sex offender. The meeting must occur before July 30, and failure to comply could jeopardize Blanche’s confirmation. Dani Bensky, an Epstein abuse survivor, testified against Blanche, whose identity was exposed due to a redaction error during the release of Epstein files.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced scrutiny during his confirmation hearing over a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund tied to a Trump-era lawsuit. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis criticized the fund, which was established in exchange for Trump dropping a $10 billion IRS-related lawsuit, while multiple Epstein abuse survivors attended the hearing. Blanche pledged not to oppose congressional efforts to ban the fund if confirmed.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces Senate scrutiny over the Department of Justice's handling of the Epstein Files and the anti-weaponization fund. Key Republican senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn have not committed to supporting his confirmation, citing concerns about the fund's status and Blanche's prior role as Trump's lawyer.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces uncertain confirmation as key Republican senators Thom Tillis and John Cornyn remain undecided. Questions persist about the DOJ's handling of Jeffrey Epstein-related documents and the status of the anti-weaponization fund, with Cornyn and Tillis expressing concerns. Senate Democrats oppose Blanche, while he faces scrutiny for his prior role as Trump's defense lawyer.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for Attorney General. The hearing included questions about the Department of Justice's 'anti-weaponization fund,' his relationship with President Donald Trump, and the release of Epstein files. Senators from both parties expressed concerns while Republicans highlighted crime statistics as evidence of the administration's effectiveness.

Todd Blanche appeared before the Senate Judiciary Committee for his confirmation as Attorney General. Senators questioned him about the Department of Justice's 'anti-weaponization fund,' his relationship with President Trump, and the release of Epstein files. Republican and Democratic senators expressed differing views on his qualifications and the DOJ's recent actions.

Todd Blanche testified before the Senate Judiciary Committee during his confirmation hearing for Attorney General. Senators questioned him about the Department of Justice's 'anti-weaponization fund,' his relationship with President Donald Trump, and the delayed release of Epstein files. Republican and Democratic senators expressed divided support and criticism.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced questions during his confirmation hearing about a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund linked to a Trump-era lawsuit against the IRS. Senators John Cornyn and Thom Tillis opposed the fund, while Blanche pledged not to block congressional efforts to ban it. The confirmation process faces challenges due to a split Senate Judiciary Committee and potential votes from retiring Republican senators.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces Senate Judiciary Committee questions during his confirmation hearing over a 'slush fund' deal and Jeffrey Epstein-related files. Lawmakers, including Republicans, challenged the $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund and new information on Epstein's associates. The confirmation process is uncertain due to the committee's split and pending decisions from key senators.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified at his Senate Judiciary Committee confirmation hearing, addressing questions about a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund and allegations of Justice Department politicization. Multiple Epstein abuse survivors attended the hearing, and senators from both parties exchanged partisan criticisms. The Republican-led committee is split after the death of Senator Lindsey Graham.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced questions during his confirmation hearing over a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund linked to a Trump lawsuit against the IRS. Senators, including key Republicans, challenged the fund's legitimacy, while discussions about Jeffrey Epstein's associates and partisan tensions marked the hearing.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced challenging questions during his confirmation process, with both Democrats and Sen. John Cornyn (R-Texas) pressing him on the 'anti-weaponization' fund. The hearing was described as more of a performance evaluation than a job interview.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche testified before the Senate Committee on the Judiciary for his confirmation hearing, facing scrutiny over a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund tied to a Trump lawsuit. Senators, particularly Republicans John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, demanded assurances the fund would not be paid out, while multiple Epstein abuse survivors attended the hearing. The committee is split 11-10 following the death of Senator Lindsey Graham.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faced skeptical questioning during a Senate confirmation hearing about a scrapped fund to compensate President Donald Trump's allies and a tax immunity deal for Trump. Lawmakers, including Sen. John Cornyn, raised concerns the fund could be revived, while Blanche asserted it was not moving forward and confirmed tax immunity remains in place. Critics accused Blanche of acting as Trump's personal lawyer and undermining the Justice Department's independence.

Sen. John Cornyn challenged Todd Blanche, acting attorney general nominee, about the status of the 'anti-weaponization fund,' which Blanche described as 'dead' but acknowledged the settlement agreement remains 'enforceable.' Cornyn, a critical Republican vote, questioned whether the fund could be revived, while Blanche emphasized there has been no written modification to the settlement. The fund originated from a Trump-led lawsuit against the IRS, which also secured audit immunity for Trump and his associates.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces Senate Judiciary Committee scrutiny over his leadership of the Justice Department, including actions like accelerating investigations into Trump opponents and managing the controversial Anti-Weaponization Fund. His confirmation requires unanimous Republican support on the panel, with key undecided senators including John Cornyn and Thom Tillis.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces Senate confirmation hearing amid scrutiny of his tenure, which included aggressive leak investigations and a controversial $1.776 billion fund. His nomination requires unanimous Republican support on the Senate Judiciary Committee, with key senators like John Cornyn and Thom Tillis holding significant influence.

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche faces Senate Judiciary Committee scrutiny over his tenure at the Justice Department, including his role in investigations, a controversial fund, and media leak pursuits. His nomination requires unanimous Republican support on the panel, with key senators like John Cornyn and Thom Tillis holding pivotal roles. Over 1,200 Justice Department alumni oppose his confirmation.

Todd Blanche’s confirmation hearing for attorney general faces scrutiny over his role in handling the Epstein Files and a controversial $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund.' Senate Judiciary Committee Democrats and some GOP members, including John Cornyn and Thom Tillis, question his conduct, with Cornyn expressing uncertainty about supporting him and Tillis reserving judgment on the fund’s issues.

Sen. Dick Durbin reported that acting Attorney General Todd Blanche described the Trump administration's $1.776 billion anti-weaponization fund as 'a mistake' during a pre-hearing meeting. The discussion occurred ahead of a hearing reviewing Blanche's nomination to lead the Justice Department.

A judge ruled that President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns was filed for an improper purpose, leading to disciplinary action against one of his lawyers. The settlement granted Trump immunity from tax audits and established a $1.776 billion fund for allies, which was later abandoned.

A federal judge ruled President Donald Trump acted in bad faith by dropping a $10 billion IRS lawsuit and directing a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The judge prohibited Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization from citing the settlement in future proceedings and barred two of their attorneys from the Southern District of Florida for at least one year.

A judge ruled that President Donald Trump's lawsuit against the IRS over leaked tax returns was filed for an 'improper purpose' and referred one of his lawyers for potential disciplinary action. The lawsuit, which sought $10 billion, ended in a settlement granting Trump immunity from tax audits and creating a $1.776 billion fund for allies, but the judge criticized the use of the court to legitimize the agreement.

A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump acted in bad faith by dropping a $10 billion IRS tax return lawsuit and directing the creation of a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The judge prohibited the Trumps and their organization from referencing the settlement and ordered reimbursement of court-appointed attorney fees.

Federal Judge Kathleen Williams ruled President Donald Trump and his associates acted in bad faith by dropping a $10 billion IRS lawsuit and creating a $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, which the judge accused them of using to manipulate judicial processes for personal and familial benefits. The court prohibited Trump, his sons, and the Trump Organization from citing the settlement in future proceedings and barred their attorneys from applying to the Southern District of Florida for at least one year.

A federal judge ruled that President Donald Trump's $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS was designed to manipulate the judicial process by justifying a settlement including a multibillion-dollar 'anti-weaponization' fund. The judge sanctioned two of Trump's attorneys and barred them from practicing in the Southern District of Florida, while also stating the lawsuit was not genuine due to lack of government opposition and cancellation of the fund by the acting Attorney General.

An Obama-appointed federal judge in Florida criticized President Donald Trump’s legal team for pursuing a $10 billion lawsuit against the IRS with an 'improper purpose' to legitimize a controversial Justice Department settlement. The judge referred Trump’s attorney Alejandro Brito to the Florida Bar for possible disciplinary action and highlighted concerns about the administration’s 'Anti-Weaponization Fund,' which Trump proposed to address government 'lawfare' but later abandoned due to backlash.

An Obama-appointed federal judge dismissed a $10 billion lawsuit by President Donald Trump against the IRS, calling it brought for an 'improper purpose' to legitimize a controversial Justice Department settlement. The judge referred Trump's attorney, Alejandro Brito, to the Florida Bar for disciplinary review and criticized Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche for allegedly misleading testimony regarding a dismissed settlement agreement.

A US judge voided a settlement between President Trump and the IRS, ruling that the president and Department of Justice misused courts in a deal related to an 'anti-weaponization' fund. The judge alleged the settlement involved self-dealing.

A Florida federal judge voided a $1.8 billion settlement agreement between President Donald Trump, the IRS, and his attorney general, accusing them of attempting to manipulate the judicial process and collude to secure immunity for Trump and his family. The judge criticized the settlement as an effort to create an 'anti-weaponization' fund and recommended sanctions against Trump's lead counsel.

A federal judge voided President Trump’s settlement with the IRS, ruling the lawsuit that led to the $1.776 billion Anti-Weaponization fund involved collusion as the parties were not truly adverse. The decision by U.S. District Judge Kathleen Williams followed a request to reopen the case for intervenors.

A judge ruled that President Donald Trump's lawsuit against the IRS was filed for an improper purpose, accusing him of manipulating the court system to secure a settlement granting him tax audit immunity and creating a fund to compensate allies. The judge criticized the Trump administration and referred one of Trump's lawyers for discipline, highlighting the settlement's invalidity due to conflicting interests.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation imposing a 100% California tax on payouts from Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization' fund. The law targets money from Trump's 'slush fund' to levy a full tax rate.

Gov. Gavin Newsom signed legislation to impose a 100% California tax on payouts from Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization' fund. The tax applies to money received from the fund by individuals or entities.

A federal judge has allowed a lawsuit over the U.S. Department of Justice's 'anti-weaponization' fund to proceed. Judge Leonie Brinkema stated that a short written declaration under penalty of perjury would have been sufficient to dismiss the case.

A judge ruled that a lawsuit against the Trump DOJ's 'anti-weaponization' fund will proceed. The decision allows legal action to continue regarding the fund's purpose.