transgender athletes

The US Supreme Court ruled that Idaho and West Virginia can enforce bans on transgender athletes participating in girls’ and women's school sports teams. The decision is part of a broader political and legal attack on trans people, particularly trans youth, and could threaten LGBTQ+ civil liberties. Experts discuss the implications of the ruling with Kai Wright, Sam Levin, and Chase Strangio.

The Supreme Court upheld state bans on transgender athletes in girls' and women's sports. CBS News legal contributor Jessica Levinson addressed constitutional questions related to the case.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can ban transgender athletes from school sports, aligning with Ohio's existing law. The decision has sparked concern within the LGBTQ+ community about potential future discrimination. Additionally, the Court protected birthright citizenship, rejecting an executive order by President Donald Trump.

The Supreme Court upheld laws banning transgender athletes from competing in women’s sports, leading Republicans to celebrate the ruling as a win while Democrats remained largely silent.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states can choose whether to allow transgender athletes to participate in sports teams aligned with their gender identity without violating the Constitution. The decision maintains existing state bans in some regions while allowing inclusive policies in others, with advocates on both sides expecting continued legal and political battles. The ruling does not mandate transgender athlete inclusion or exclusion, leaving the issue to state legislatures and courts.

The Supreme Court weakened the Title IX case for transgender athletes in female sports, but Democrats show no sign of changing their stance. Biological males are expected to continue participating in girls' varsity teams like volleyball, soccer, and basketball.

The Supreme Court issued rulings that gave President Trump a victory on transgender athletes while overturning his birthright citizenship executive order and altering campaign finance law. A terror-style parcel bomb in Monaco triggered an international manhunt involving a Ukrainian suspect.

The Supreme Court upheld state laws banning transgender athletes from girls' and women's sports, a decision supported by activists like Riley Gaines and Mary Kate Marshall, who argued for preserving competitive fairness. The ruling followed a years-long legal battle initiated by Idaho athletes challenging a 2019 lawsuit that blocked similar state restrictions.

The Supreme Court upheld states' rights to ban transgender athletes from competing in girls and women's sports, provoking reactions from the usual suspects.

The Supreme Court upheld state bans on transgender athletes competing in girls’ and women’s sports. Geoff Bennett discussed the ruling with Katie Barnes, a senior writer for ESPN covering sports and gender.

The US Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship under the 14th Amendment, ending an unenforced executive action by President Donald Trump. It also ruled states may ban transgender athletes from certain sports teams, though it did not mandate such bans. Colorado, which lacks specific laws on transgender athletes, faces a voter measure addressing sports team definitions.

The Supreme Court ruled that states can exclude transgender athletes from competing on girls and women's school sports teams. LGBT Life Center CEO Stacie Walls noted the ruling was not surprising and highlighted its timing during Pride month.

The Supreme Court ruled that states can ban transgender athletes from competing in girls and women's school and college sports. The decision centers on whether such bans are permissible under state laws.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in female sports. The decision aligns with existing regulations that restrict transgender athletes' inclusion in female competitions.

The Supreme Court ruled states can ban transgender athletes from competing in girls' and women's sports. Idaho Attorney General Raúl Labrador states states without such bans will face further litigation.

The US Supreme Court released a decision on birthright citizenship and allowed a ban on transgender athletes participating in girls’ sports. The rulings are part of the court’s final decisions for its 2025–26 term.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that ban transgender athletes from participating on women’s and girls’ sports teams, ruling 6-3 that the bans do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The decision rejected claims that Title IX or its 1974 amendment prohibits such restrictions, with dissenting justices arguing the majority failed to address factual disputes about transgender and cisgender athletes’ comparability.

The Supreme Court issued rulings on three significant cases before its summer recess, covering birthright citizenship, transgender athletes' participation in girls’ sports, and the spending limits for political parties in elections.

The Supreme Court permitted states to prohibit transgender athletes from participating in girls’ sports. Becky Pepper-Jackson contested West Virginia’s laws restricting transgender athletes in women’s sports.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that ban transgender athletes from participating in women’s and girls’ sports teams, ruling 6-3 that the bans do not violate the Equal Protection Clause or Title IX. The decision marks a setback for transgender rights, with liberal justices dissenting over unresolved factual disputes about transgender and cisgender girls' equality in sports.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled 6-3 that states can restrict transgender athletes from participating in school sports teams aligned with their gender identity, upholding laws in 29 states. Justice Brett Kavanaugh, writing for the majority, argued Title IX’s reference to 'sex' in sports participation pertains to biological sex, while dissenting Justice Sonia Sotomayor criticized the decision for its impact on transgender rights and opportunities.

The U.S. Supreme Court ruled that states may ban transgender girls from participating in women's sports at publicly funded schools, citing Title IX's allowance for sex-segregated athletic teams. The decision followed a case involving Lindsey Hecox, a trans student in Idaho, and comes amid broader debates over gender-affirming care restrictions in 25 states.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit transgender athletes from participating on women’s and girls’ sports teams. The 6-3 decision ruled the bans do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment or Title IX, marking a setback for transgender rights. The ruling also coincided with President Donald Trump’s administration pursuing an anti-trans agenda.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws in Idaho and West Virginia banning transgender athletes from women’s and girls’ sports teams in a 6-3 decision, ruling the bans do not violate the Equal Protection Clause of the 14th Amendment. The court also confirmed Title IX does not block such restrictions, marking a significant setback for transgender rights.

The US Supreme Court upheld bans on transgender athletes participating in sports aligned with their gender identity. The decision reinforces existing policies that restrict transgender individuals from competing in sports categories matching their gender identity.

The US Supreme Court upheld state laws prohibiting transgender athletes from participating in girls' and women's school sports, marking a significant win for conservatives in a contentious cultural debate.

The U.S. Supreme Court upheld state laws that prohibit transgender athletes from participating in women's sports. The decision supports existing bans on transgender athletes in female competitive categories.

The Supreme Court upheld bans in Idaho and West Virginia that prohibit transgender girls from participating in girls’ and women’s school sports teams in a 6-3 decision. The ruling, led by Justice Brett Kavanaugh, allows states to enforce similar laws affecting over half the country.

The U.S. Supreme Court is concluding its term with decisions on cases involving President Donald Trump's claims of presidential power, including restrictions on birthright citizenship, agency head removals, and transgender athletes in sports. The court also addresses election laws, geofence warrants, and immigration policies, with its conservative majority generally supporting Trump's immigration measures but rejecting his emergency tariff claims.

The Education Department is transferring oversight of special education and civil rights to the Justice Department and HHS, aligning with President Trump's goal to dismantle the department. These moves reduce the Education Department's responsibilities, with the Justice Department handling civil rights enforcement and student privacy, and HHS managing special education programs.

The Supreme Court is set to issue final rulings on cases involving election laws, immigration policies, and transgender athlete regulations, with potential impacts on voting procedures, birthright citizenship, and asylum processes. Key cases include challenges to Mississippi's mail-in ballot rules, limits on campaign financing coordination, and Trump's birthright citizenship order.

The Trump administration is shifting from targeting individual colleges with investigations to rewriting federal rules governing higher education. New regulations aim to address diversity, equity and inclusion policies, transgender athlete participation, and perceived anti-white discrimination, affecting thousands of institutions. The approach includes proposals for accreditation changes and restricting federal grants from supporting 'anti-American values.'

The article highlights that legislation banning transgender athletes is linked to broader efforts by the same politicians to roll back protections for women. It argues these policies are not primarily about protecting women but are part of a coordinated strategy.

The Trump administration is shifting from targeting individual colleges with investigations to proposing broad federal rules affecting all U.S. universities. New regulations focus on diversity, equity, and inclusion policies, transgender athletes, antisemitism, and perceived anti-white discrimination. Agencies like the Education Department and Office of Management and Budget are introducing measures to align federal grants and accreditation with the administration’s priorities.

Martina Navratilova claims she attempted to warn Kamala Harris' campaign about concerns regarding transgender athletes and women’s sex-based rights but was ignored. She argues Democrats privately agree with her stance but avoid public statements due to political risks, citing a 2025 poll showing 67% of Democrats oppose allowing biological males to compete in women’s sports.

The Supreme Court is set to rule on cases involving birthright citizenship, gun rights, transgender athletes, and President Trump's authority over independent agencies during its final term month in June.

Maine Secretary of State Shenna Bellows rejected a ballot question regarding transgender athletes in January. The decision was administrative, focusing on procedural compliance rather than the policy's content.

The U.S. Department of Education has ceased updating a public list of schools under investigation for civil rights violations since January 2025, raising concerns about transparency. Journalists found the department under the Trump administration prioritizing investigations into antisemitism and transgender athletes while neglecting racial harassment cases, leading to a lawsuit by ProPublica after repeated failed requests for information.