Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

U.S. District Judge William Ray

Coverage of U.S. District Judge William Ray in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jul 7 · 19:26 UTCMost recent: Jul 21 · 13:15 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Recent coverage
  • CRIMEJul 21 · 13:15 UTCJUST SECURITY
    Trust, But Verify: Three Grand Jury Reforms to Hold the Government Accountable

    The article discusses three proposed reforms to Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure (Rules 5, 6, and 16) aimed at enhancing grand jury accountability. These reforms include disclosing grand jury transcripts to courts, granting defendants access to legal instructions given to grand juries, and requiring prosecutors to confirm the legal accuracy of those instructions. The reforms are presented as necessary to address federal prosecutors' misconduct and ensure fair outcomes.

  • POLITICSJul 7 · 22:08 UTCNY POST
    Judge rejects Justice Department’s attempt to obtain names of 2020 election workers in Georgia

    A US District Judge rejected the Justice Department’s attempt to obtain names of 2020 election workers in Georgia using a grand jury, ruling that the DOJ cannot misuse grand jury procedures for its own purposes.

  • POLITICSJul 7 · 20:44 UTCTHE HILL
    Judge quashes DOJ subpoena for names of Fulton County’s 2020 election staff

    A federal judge denied the Justice Department's request for personal information from election workers in Fulton County, Georgia, as part of its investigation into President Trump's unsubstantiated claims of election fraud in the 2020 election. The judge ruled that the DOJ could not use a grand jury subpoena to obtain the information.

  • POLITICSJul 7 · 19:26 UTCKOAA NBC5 COLORADO SPRINGS
    Judge rejects DOJ's attempt to get names of 2020 Georgia election workers

    A federal judge rejected the U.S. Department of Justice's grand jury subpoena seeking names and contact information of 2020 election workers in Georgia's Fulton County, ruling it unreasonable and overly broad. The Justice Department argued the subpoena was part of a normal investigation, while Fulton County claimed it aimed to harass political opponents and exceeded reasonable needs.