Michigan family

The Supreme Court ruled against a Michigan family whose home was sold for less than half its market value to cover a $2,000 tax debt, upholding county practices that allow lower auction prices for tax foreclosures. The court rejected the family's claim that the sale violated their rights, with the county arguing that requiring open-market prices would undermine tax collection processes.

The Supreme Court ruled against a Michigan family whose home was sold for less than half its market value to cover a $2,000 unpaid tax bill, upholding county arguments that auction prices are inherently lower due to cash payment requirements. The decision contrasts with a prior case where the Court limited local governments' ability to retain excess tax sale proceeds.

The Supreme Court ruled against a Michigan family whose home was sold for less than half its market value to cover a $2,000 tax debt, upholding lower auction prices for tax foreclosures. The county argued auction sales require full cash payments, leading to lower prices, while the family claimed the sale violated their rights. The decision follows a prior case where the Court limited counties from keeping excess tax sale proceeds.

A Michigan family behind the Ambassador Bridge is expanding their controversial concrete business to Canada. The expansion has drawn attention due to its contentious nature.

The Michigan family that owns the Ambassador Bridge, which connects Ontario and Michigan, is planning to expand its concrete business operations into Canada. The expansion involves their controversial concrete empire crossing the border.