Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Grant v. Higgins

Coverage of Grant v. Higgins in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jun 30 · 21:59 UTCMost recent: Jul 12 · 19:21 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Second Amendmenttopic2Viramontes v. Cook Countytopic2James Talaricoperson1Jonathan Turleyperson1U.S. Senateorganization1Supreme Courtorganization1AR-15topic1U.S. Supreme Courtorganization1Cook Countyplace1Illinoisplace1Connecticutplace1Andrew Willingerperson1AR-15-style riflestopic1
Recent coverage
  • POLITICSJul 12 · 19:21 UTCFOX NEWS
    JONATHAN TURLEY: James Talarico's defense of gun control leaves out a key word

    James Talarico, a Democratic state representative running for U.S. Senate in Texas, argues that the Second Amendment supports gun control by citing the phrase 'well regulated.' Jonathan Turley critiques this interpretation, noting Talarico omits the word 'militia' that follows 'well regulated' in the amendment. The article highlights legal debates over the amendment's wording and upcoming Supreme Court cases on gun laws.

  • POLITICSJun 30 · 21:59 UTCTHE TRACE
    The Supreme Court Will Decide Whether States Can Ban Assault Weapons

    The U.S. Supreme Court has agreed to hear two cases challenging assault weapons bans in Cook County, Illinois, and Connecticut. The decision could determine the constitutionality of such bans under the Second Amendment, potentially affecting similar laws in other states. The cases, Viramontes v. Cook County and Grant v. Higgins, will be argued in October 2023, with a ruling expected by 2024.