Federal grants
Coverage of Federal grants in the Nexus archive.
- Trump’s university ‘compact’ is gone. That doesn’t mean the assault on education is over | Kenneth Roth
The Trump administration abandoned its controversial Compact for Academic Excellence in Higher Education, which required universities to align with Trump's ideology for federal grants. Universities collectively opposed the proposal, but the article warns that vigilance remains necessary to protect educational autonomy.
- Spending deal freezes Trump proposal to gain power over federal grants, extends highway law
A bipartisan Senate Appropriations Committee deal freezes the Trump administration's proposed federal grant criteria and extends highway funding, keeping the government funded until Dec. 11. The agreement avoids a government shutdown and maintains current spending levels, differing from the House's more partisan stopgap measure.
- Trump administration admits canceling clean energy grants to Democratic states
The Trump administration admitted to canceling over $7.5 billion in federal grants for clean energy projects to states based solely on their support for Donald Trump in the 2024 election. Court filings revealed the funding was terminated in October targeting projects in states represented by Democrats and those that voted for Kamala Harris.
- Trump proposal will turn federal grants into a system of political favors, Democrats warn
Democrats in Congress oppose a Trump administration proposal to alter federal grant administration by granting political appointees authority to decide grant recipients. The draft rule, titled 'Regulation for Federal Financial Assistance,' could affect hundreds of billions in funding and restrict the use of grants for diversity, equity, and inclusion initiatives.
- Judge: Trump admin can't cut millions in Grants to New York
A federal judge blocked the Trump administration from cutting federal grants to New York and 23 other states, ruling the government cannot unilaterally cancel allocated funds by changing regulatory priorities.
- President Trump’s priorities could put a hefty portion of federal grants in Vermont on the chopping block under proposed rule
A proposed Office of Management and Budget rule could jeopardize federal funding for research and programs in Vermont, including medical research at the University of Vermont and rural hospital funding. The rule would subject federal grants to review by political appointees aligning them with presidential priorities, potentially disrupting peer-reviewed processes and impacting over one-third of Vermont’s state budget reliant on federal funds.
- Bush and Hobby Airports receive $126M in federal grants for infrastructure improvements
Bush and Hobby Airports received a total of $126 million in federal grants for infrastructure improvements. Hobby Airport will use $66 million for a full concrete runway reconstruction, while Bush Airport will allocate $62 million to upgrade its inter-terminal train systems, improve airfield drainage infrastructure, and modernize HVAC systems.
- US taxpayers should not have to fund DEI in California
Judge William Orrick blocked the Trump administration from cutting federal grants to cities that use diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) policies. The ruling prevents restrictions on funding for cities implementing such policies.
- Scientists overwhelmingly against rule change that would give political appointees say over science grants
Scientists, including Nobel laureates, oppose a proposed rule change that would grant political appointees influence over federal science grant approvals, warning it could severely harm American scientific research.
- Trump administration seeks to limit federal funding that doesn't 'advance' presidential policies
The Trump administration is proposing a rule to restrict federal funding for programs that do not support presidential policies. The rule would grant political appointees significant control over federal grants in research, education, and infrastructure.
- OMB nominee touts plan to give Trump appointees power to kill grants
Hal Duncan, Trump's nominee for deputy director of the Office of Management and Budget, proposed new grant rules to prevent federal funds from supporting 'divisive ideologies.' The plan would give political appointees authority to approve or block grants to various groups, with the administration aiming to finalize the changes by summer. Democrats criticized the proposal, warning it could be used to favor groups aligned with Trump while punishing others.
- President Trump seeks control of science funding
President Trump is seeking increased control over federal science funding through the White House Office of Management and Budget. Critics argue this move could compromise the integrity of U.S. science.
- President Trump seeks control of science funding
The White House Office of Management and Budget is moving to take more control of billions in federal grants. Critics argue the change could jeopardize the integrity of U.S. science.
- White House seeks to impose political test on billions in federal grants
The White House proposes blocking federal grants if they do not align with President Trump’s agenda or support what the administration labels as 'anti-American' values. The plan aims to tie grant approvals to adherence to specific political priorities.
- STAT+: Trump administration seeks to overhaul federal grantmaking process, alarming researchers
The Trump administration has proposed overhauling federal grant regulations to increase political control over federally funded research. The changes would reduce the role of peer review, restrict scientists' use of funds for publishing and travel, and grant political appointees more power to terminate grants. The proposal aligns with prior executive orders and would apply government-wide if formalized.
- Researchers say the Trump administration is finding new ways to punish science
Scientists report that the Trump administration is finding new ways to prevent federal research grants from reaching researchers, even though the grants themselves have been largely restored. The obstruction is already having measurable consequences for the scientific community.