U.S. science

The U.S. science community is described as being in chaos due to a broken compact between science and politics. The article, published by Scientific American, highlights tensions in this relationship.

Rochelle Walensky, former director of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, discusses threats to U.S. science and potential solutions to address them.

Geoffrey Hinton, a machine-learning expert, discusses how politics is undermining U.S. science. The article highlights concerns about political influence on scientific progress.

Sally Kornbluth, a university president and biomedical scientist, discusses the current state of U.S. science, highlighting both hope and doubt.

Robert Metcalfe, an Internet pioneer, discusses tenure and publications, emphasizing necessary changes for U.S. science to advance. He highlights topics critical to the future of scientific progress in the United States.

The White House Office of Management and Budget is moving to take more control of billions in federal grants. Critics argue the change could jeopardize the integrity of U.S. science.

National Academy of Sciences president Marcia McNutt warned that U.S. science must innovate to survive, describing the past year as 'filled with turmoil' for the field.

The article argues that the MAGA movement is undermining U.S. scientific institutions and challenging scientific consensus, particularly in areas like climate change and public health. It highlights the political influence of MAGA in shaping science policy and eroding trust in expert research.

The Trump administration claimed to prioritize 'gold standard science,' but scientists argue that political agendas have compromised scientific integrity. Critics assert that the administration's approach has tarnished the golden era of science it promised.