Democracy Forward

A coalition of organizations is urging Governor Gretchen Whitmer to withdraw Michigan National Guard troops from Washington, D.C., arguing they are not being used for the stated America 250 mission but are instead part of a broader task force. The letter highlights that other Democratic governors have already withdrawn their forces, and Whitmer's office is reviewing the request while emphasizing troops should only support the America 250 mission.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration's rule to narrow eligibility for the Public Service Loan Forgiveness program, ruling it unlawful as it imposed political preferences not enacted by Congress. The decision preserves access to the program for public service employers ahead of the rule's scheduled July 1 effective date.

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants totaling $68 million under the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, citing misalignment with agency priorities. Grantees included universities, health departments, and Planned Parenthood affiliates in multiple states, with one organization, AccessMatters, stating the termination would devastate youth access to reproductive health programs.

President Trump advised against using Signal after his advisers accidentally sent war plans to The Atlantic's editor, but top officials continued using the app for group chats with auto-deletion settings. The State Department released records via FOIA litigation, revealing Signal chats between national security figures, including a group with Secretary of State Marco Rubio, Secretary of Defense Pete Hegseth, and Joint Chiefs of Staff Chairman Dan Caine, raising concerns about compliance with federal record-keeping laws.

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants under the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, affecting $68 million in funding for organizations in over two dozen states. The cancellations, effective immediately, were cited as misaligned with agency priorities, particularly for programs deemed to normalize or promote sexual activity for minors.

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants under its Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, affecting over $68 million in funding across multiple states. The termination cited misalignment with agency priorities, including claims that some programs 'normalize or promote sexual activity for minors.'

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants under the Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, affecting over $68 million in funding across more than two dozen states. The cancellations, effective immediately, were cited as misaligned with agency priorities, particularly for programs deemed to 'normalize or promote sexual activity for minors.'

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants under its Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, citing misalignment with agency priorities, including those funding programs in Pennsylvania. The cancellations, effective immediately, affect $68 million in funding for organizations like AccessMatters, which provides reproductive health services to over 1,100 teens. The Trump administration previously took similar actions in 2017, leading to a lawsuit.

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 grants under its Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program, affecting $68 million in funding across multiple states. Grantees, including universities and Planned Parenthood affiliates, were notified the programs misaligned with agency priorities, such as normalizing sexual activity for minors.

The U.S. Health and Human Services agency canceled 53 out of 67 Teen Pregnancy Prevention Program grants, affecting over $68 million in funding across multiple states including Michigan. The termination cited misalignment with agency priorities, including claims that some programs 'normalize or promote sexual activity for minors.'

A West Texas economic development group sued the Trump administration over a border wall project, alleging it violates federal law by failing to obtain required permissions for construction over a levee system and increases flood risks. The Presidio Municipal Development District argues the project could block water flow from arroyos and creeks into the Rio Grande, potentially causing catastrophic flooding. Customs and Border Protection stated the wall's construction plans, funded by the One Big Beautiful Bill Act, are still in the planning stages.

A West Texas economic development group sued the Trump administration over a border wall project, alleging it violates federal law by failing to obtain required permissions and increases flood risks. The Presidio Municipal Development District claims the wall's construction over a levee system could cause catastrophic flooding, with legal representatives seeking emergency relief to block the project. The Trump administration responded that the border barrier plans are still in development.

An economic development group in West Texas sued the Trump administration, alleging the border wall project violates federal law by failing to obtain required permissions for construction over a levee system, which could increase flood risks. The lawsuit, filed in the U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, claims the Department of Homeland Security and Customs and Border Protection did not conduct mandated flood safety reviews.

A federal judge dismissed a lawsuit alleging the U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) unlawfully reduced transgender workplace protections. The court ruled it lacked jurisdiction and that the plaintiff, FreeState Justice, lacked standing. The EEOC, under Chair Andrea Lucas, adjusted its enforcement approach following an executive order from President Donald Trump.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The judge cited concerns about the fund's potential use to pay Trump supporters, including individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which led to multiple lawsuits.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faced legal challenges over concerns it would support individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge indefinitely extended a block on a $1.8 billion anti-weaponization fund under the Trump administration. The judge ordered officials to confirm the fund would not proceed, while the administration argued the case is moot after announcing it would not go forward. Critics called the fund a 'slush fund' for political allies and a tool for compensating those linked to the Jan. 6 insurrection.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump’s $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a written agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former Department of Justice prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from groups including Democracy Forward and Common Cause, who argue it could fund individuals involved in the 2021 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Donald Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution in writing. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, over concerns it could support individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces lawsuits over concerns it could pay individuals involved in the 2021 Capitol riot.

A federal judge extended a block on the Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' until further notice, rejecting the government's claim that lawsuits challenging the fund are moot. The fund, created to resolve a lawsuit over leaked tax returns, faces bipartisan opposition, and acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced plans to scrap it, though plaintiffs and judges remain unconvinced.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a 'clear, unambiguous' agreement confirming its dissolution. Plaintiffs include a former Department of Justice Jan. 6 prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, who argue the fund could pay Trump supporters involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia blocked President Trump’s $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign an agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created by the Department of Justice in exchange for Trump dropping his lawsuit against the IRS, faces lawsuits from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

A federal judge extended a block on the Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund', rejecting the government's claim that lawsuits against it are moot. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the fund's cancellation due to backlash, but Judge Leonie Brinkema ruled the block remains in place until the government provides a sworn declaration it will not revive the fund.

A federal judge extended a block on Trump’s $1.8 billion Anti-Weaponization Fund, which aims to compensate victims of a weaponized government. The Trump administration plans to scrap the fund due to bipartisan backlash, but plaintiffs argue it is illegal to divert taxpayer money for such payouts.

A federal judge extended a block on the Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' amid legal challenges. Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the government would abandon the fund due to backlash, but plaintiffs and Judge Leonie Brinkema rejected assurances it would not proceed. Another judge, Richard Leon, accepted Blanche's claim that the fund is moot.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies freezing asylum applications from 39 countries violated federal law. The policies were implemented after a shooting in Washington, D.C., that injured National Guard members, and the judge criticized the administration for placing immigrants in legal limbo.

A federal judge ruled that the Trump administration's freeze on processing asylum applications and green cards for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration laws. The policy, enacted after a Washington, D.C., shooting that killed a National Guard member, was criticized for creating legal uncertainty for immigrants. The judge emphasized that the policy targeted individuals based on their birthplace, not their actions.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies freezing asylum processing for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration laws. The policies, implemented after a 2025 shooting in Washington, D.C. that killed a National Guard member, were criticized as discriminatory and causing legal limbo for immigrants. A federal court in Rhode Island struck down the policies following a lawsuit by labor unions and advocacy groups.

A federal judge ruled against a Trump administration immigration policy that restricted immigrants from 39 countries, citing unlawful actions by USCIS and causing legal uncertainty. The policy, enacted after a National Guard shooting, barred these immigrants from processing asylum, work permits, and citizenship applications.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies freezing asylum processing for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration laws, affecting asylum-seekers and legal immigrants. The policies were implemented after a shooting in Washington, D.C., that killed a National Guard member and injured another.

A federal judge ruled against a Trump administration immigration policy that restricted entry and residency for immigrants from 39 countries. The policy, enacted after a National Guard shooting, was criticized for causing legal uncertainty and violating immigration laws, with the judge calling it 'arbitrary and capricious.' The decision impacts pending USCIS cases involving applicants from affected countries.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies freezing asylum processing for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration law, citing the policies' creation of legal limbo for immigrants. The policies were enacted after a Washington, D.C. shooting by an Afghan national with asylum status and were challenged by labor unions and advocacy groups.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies halting asylum processing for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration laws, causing legal uncertainty for immigrants. The policies were implemented after a Washington, D.C., shooting that killed a National Guard member and were criticized as discriminatory based on birthplace.

A federal judge ruled that Trump administration policies halting asylum processing for immigrants from 39 countries violated immigration laws. The policies were implemented after a shooting in Washington, D.C., that killed a National Guard member, and the judge criticized the administration for placing immigrants in legal limbo.

A federal judge ruled against a Trump administration immigration policy that restricted entry and residency for immigrants from 39 countries, citing unlawful and discriminatory practices by U.S. Citizenship and Immigration Services. The policy, enacted after a National Guard shooting, caused legal uncertainty for immigrants seeking asylum, work permits, and citizenship.

A federal judge blocked a Trump administration policy restricting asylum and immigration pathways for individuals from 39 countries, citing legal limbo for immigrants. The Senate passed legislation to fund immigration enforcement agencies, while the U.S. job market added 172,000 jobs in May.

A federal judge struck down a Trump administration immigration policy that barred immigrants from 39 countries from receiving decisions on asylum, work permits, and citizenship applications. The judge criticized the policy as unlawful, arbitrary, and discriminatory, citing harm to immigrants and communities.