Common Cause

The Nebraska Supreme Court dismissed a lawsuit seeking to block the state from sharing voter data with the U.S. Department of Justice, ruling the case moot after the data was already released. The case, brought by Common Cause and a voter, was previously denied standing in a lower court before the state complied with the federal request for voter registration information.

Governor Ron DeSantis vetoed a bill allowing high school students to volunteer at polling locations, citing concerns about potential violations of a state law prohibiting single-party poll workers. The Southern Poverty Law Center (SPLC) and other organizations supported the legislation, which passed unanimously in both chambers of the Florida legislature.

A lawsuit filed by voter advocacy groups challenges Colorado Springs' April city elections, alleging they create racial disparities in voter turnout. The groups argue off-cycle elections disproportionately suppress Black and Hispanic voter participation, violating the Colorado Voting Rights Act. City leaders, including Mayor Yemi Mobolade, defend the city's right to hold off-cycle elections under home rule governance.

Transparency groups ACLU of Massachusetts, Common Cause, and Massachusetts Newspaper Publishers Association supported a bill addressing public records requirements for lawmakers but avoided commenting on its controversial provision limiting the state auditor's power to audit the Legislature. The bill, criticized by Auditor Diana DiZoglio, combined both issues, leading to confusion among observers and criticism from transparency advocates not consulted during its drafting.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The judge cited concerns about the fund's potential use to pay Trump supporters, including individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot, which led to multiple lawsuits.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faced legal challenges over concerns it would support individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting President Donald Trump’s $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a written agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former Department of Justice prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from groups including Democracy Forward and Common Cause, who argue it could fund individuals involved in the 2021 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a formal agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction blocking President Donald Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution in writing. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, over concerns it could support individuals involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia issued a preliminary injunction halting Trump’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to confirm its dissolution. The fund, created in exchange for Trump dropping a lawsuit against the IRS, faces lawsuits over concerns it could pay individuals involved in the 2021 Capitol riot.

A federal judge blocked the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign a 'clear, unambiguous' agreement confirming its dissolution. Plaintiffs include a former Department of Justice Jan. 6 prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, who argue the fund could pay Trump supporters involved in the Jan. 6 Capitol riot.

A federal judge in Virginia blocked President Trump’s $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund for one week, requiring the government to sign an agreement confirming its dissolution. The fund, created by the Department of Justice in exchange for Trump dropping his lawsuit against the IRS, faces lawsuits from plaintiffs including a former DOJ prosecutor and a protester, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause.

U.S. Senate Democrats and police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection opposed the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The fund, part of a deal after Trump dropped an IRS lawsuit, faces Democratic amendments as Senate Republicans struggle to pass an immigration bill.

Senate Democrats, including Dick Durbin, and former Capitol Police officers criticized the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The fund, part of a settlement tied to Trump’s IRS lawsuit, faces opposition from Democrats and legal challenges by officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection.

Senate Democrats and police officers who responded to the Jan. 6 insurrection opposed the Trump administration's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund at a press conference. The fund, announced by the Department of Justice as part of a settlement with Trump's IRS lawsuit, is criticized as a 'slush fund' by Democrats, who plan to propose amendments to restrict it if Senate Republicans advance their immigration bill.

Senate Democrats and police officers who defended the Capitol during the Jan. 6 insurrection opposed the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund. The fund, linked to a lawsuit against the IRS, emerged as Senate Republicans struggled to pass an immigration bill. Democrats plan to introduce amendments to restrict the fund’s use.

U.S. Senate Democrats and former Capitol Police officers criticized the Trump administration’s $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund during a press conference, organized by Public Citizen and Common Cause, as Senate Republicans struggled to pass an immigration bill. The fund, announced by the Department of Justice, was part of a settlement involving a lawsuit against the IRS and grants immunity to Trump and his family from government inquiries.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from proceeding with a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' amid a lawsuit challenging its legality. The fund, created as part of a settlement over leaked tax returns, is accused of violating constitutional rights and congressional authority by plaintiffs including a former federal prosecutor and a professor.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's 'anti-weaponization fund,' which aims to pay individuals claiming wrongdoing by past administrations. The block follows a lawsuit alleging the fund violates constitutional rights and congressional authority, with a hearing scheduled for June 12.

A U.S. judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's Justice Department from operating a $1.778 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' designed to compensate Americans targeted by federal investigations. The block follows a lawsuit by plaintiffs including a former prosecutor, a professor, and organizations like Common Cause and the National Abortion Federation, who argue the fund could incentivize violence and misuse public funds.

A U.S. judge temporarily blocked the Justice Department from operating a $1.778 billion 'Anti-Weaponization Fund' created by the Trump administration to compensate individuals allegedly targeted by politicized investigations. The block follows a lawsuit by plaintiffs including a former prosecutor and groups opposing the fund, with a hearing scheduled for June 12.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from proceeding with a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' critics argue benefits political allies. The fund, established via a settlement in a Trump lawsuit over leaked tax returns, faces legal challenges alleging constitutional violations. Judge Leonie Brinkema halted disbursements pending a June 12 hearing.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's 'anti-weaponization fund' after plaintiffs argued it violates constitutional rights and congressional authority. The fund, part of a settlement over leaked tax returns, aims to pay individuals claiming harm from past administrations. Judge Leonie Brinkema halted disbursements pending a June 12 hearing.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from advancing a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' created as part of a settlement over leaked tax returns. The fund, overseen by a board selected by acting Attorney General Todd Blanche, faces legal challenges from a former prosecutor and a professor, represented by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, who argue it violates constitutional rights and congressional authority.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's 'anti-weaponization fund' while legal challenges continue. The fund, part of a $1.8 billion settlement from a tax return leak lawsuit, aims to compensate individuals claiming harm from past administrations. A lawsuit by a former prosecutor and a professor, supported by Democracy Forward and Common Cause, alleges the fund violates constitutional rights and congressional authority.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from advancing a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, which opponents argue could be used to pay political allies. The fund, created via a settlement in a lawsuit over leaked tax returns, is now halted pending a hearing on June 12, with plaintiffs alleging constitutional violations.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's 'anti-weaponization fund' while legal challenges continue. The fund, created as part of a settlement over leaked tax return information, is accused of violating constitutional rights and congressional authority by plaintiffs including a former prosecutor and a professor. The judge's order halts disbursements until a June 12 hearing.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration’s 'anti-weaponization fund' while legal challenges proceed. The fund, part of a settlement from a lawsuit over leaked tax returns, aims to pay individuals claiming past administrations wronged them. Plaintiffs in the lawsuit argue the fund violates constitutional rights and congressional authority.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration's 'anti-weaponization fund', which opponents argue could pay political allies. The fund, created via a settlement over leaked tax returns, is challenged in a lawsuit alleging constitutional violations. A hearing is set for June 12 to address the block.

A federal judge temporarily blocked the Trump administration from advancing a $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization fund' while a lawsuit challenging its legality proceeds. The fund, created as part of a settlement over leaked tax returns, faces claims it violates constitutional rights and congressional authority. The judge’s order halts further actions on the fund until a June 12 hearing.

President Donald Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the Department of Justice to settle his lawsuit against the IRS, has sparked legal challenges and political divisions. Critics argue it risks rewarding January 6, 2021, riot defendants and concealing payout details, while Republican lawmakers debate its inclusion in immigration funding legislation. A federal court temporarily blocked the fund on May 29, pending a June 12 hearing.

The Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established to settle a lawsuit against the IRS, has drawn legal challenges and political backlash. Concerns include potential payments to Jan. 6 rioters and the fund's secrecy, while Senate Republicans delay immigration funding legislation due to disputes over its oversight.

The Trump administration's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established to settle a lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges and Republican opposition. Concerns include potential payouts to Jan. 6 rioters and lack of transparency, with a court temporarily blocking the fund pending a June 12 hearing.

The Trump administration's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established to settle a lawsuit against the IRS, has faced legal challenges and political backlash. Critics argue it risks rewarding Jan. 6 rioters and lacks transparency, while Republicans have split over its oversight. A federal court temporarily blocked the fund's implementation pending a June 12 hearing.

President Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the DOJ to settle his lawsuit against the IRS, has sparked legal challenges and political divisions over concerns it could reward Jan. 6 rioters and lack transparency. A federal court temporarily blocked the fund, and Republican lawmakers have demanded congressional oversight before supporting its implementation.

President Donald Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the Department of Justice to settle his lawsuit against the IRS, has faced legal challenges and political backlash. Concerns include potential payouts to Jan. 6 rioters and lack of transparency, with a federal judge temporarily blocking the fund. Congressional Republicans are divided, and advocacy groups like CREW and Democracy Forward are contesting its legality.

President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the Department of Justice to settle his lawsuit against the IRS, has faced legal challenges and political backlash. Critics, including advocacy groups like CREW, argue the fund lacks transparency and risks rewarding Jan. 6 rioters, while Republican lawmakers debate its legitimacy. A court temporarily blocked the fund on May 29, pending a June 12 hearing.

President Donald Trump's $1.8 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the Department of Justice to settle a lawsuit against the IRS, has faced legal challenges and political backlash. Critics argue the fund risks rewarding Jan. 6 riot defendants and lacks transparency, while Republican lawmakers have demanded oversight and guardrails before supporting related legislation.

President Trump's $1.776 billion 'anti-weaponization' fund, established by the DOJ to settle his lawsuit against the IRS, faces legal challenges and Republican opposition. Critics argue it risks rewarding Jan. 6 rioters and lacks transparency, while Senate Republicans demand oversight measures. A federal court temporarily blocked the fund on May 29.