POLITICSTHE HINDU NATIONAL
States cannot cite financial burden to oppose raising retirement age of judicial officers: Supreme Court
The Supreme Court ruled that states cannot use financial burden as a reason to oppose increasing the retirement age of judicial officers. The court stated that retaining experienced judicial officers may result in lower financial costs compared to replacing them.
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- Supreme Court asks States, UTs to consider raising retirement age of judicial officers from 60 to 61 years
- Giving up the gavel: New York upholds mandatory retirement age for judges
- NY’s highest court upholds age cap for judges while cautioning against age discrimination
- New York judges must retire at 76, says high court, ruling against age discrimination
- HC dismisses pleas for superannuation age enhancement
- Supreme Court strikes down limits on party spending in federal elections, backing Republican appeal