Skip to content
The Nexus
POLITICSJul 22 · 14:00 UTCSCOTUSBLOGBrian Fitzpatrick

The case for Callais

The author defends the Supreme Court's 6-3 decision in Louisiana v. Callais, arguing it correctly upheld that the Voting Rights Act's Section 2 cannot require racial considerations in redistricting due to constitutional constraints. The essay criticizes academia's ideological alignment on race issues, citing Elena Kagan's advice to avoid race discrimination scholarship if opposing racial preferences.

Nexus surfaces and summarizes. The full story lives at the source.

Mentioned
Spot something wrong with this article?Report a problem →
Forward this
Related Signal

Adjacent reporting