Skip to content
The Nexus
POLITICSJul 17 · 14:00 UTCSCOTUSBLOGCésar Cuauhtémoc García Hernández

In birthright citizenship dissent, Justice Thomas stakes out an ideological claim of who counts as an American

The Supreme Court upheld birthright citizenship in Trump v. Barbara, rejecting President Trump’s executive order to narrow it. Justices Thomas and Gorsuch dissented, arguing the 14th Amendment’s citizenship clause should focus on domicile and jurisdiction, framing the issue as an ideological debate about who qualifies as 'American.' Thomas criticized the majority’s interpretation as inconsistent with constitutional text and history.

Nexus surfaces and summarizes. The full story lives at the source.

Mentioned
Spot something wrong with this article?Report a problem →
Forward this
Related Signal

Adjacent reporting

In birthright citizenship dissent, Justice Thomas stakes out an ideological claim of who counts as an American · The Nexus