Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department
Coverage of Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department in the Nexus archive.
- Why do animal rights groups hate Vermont?
The article argues that animal rights groups use misinformation to criticize Vermont's hunting, trapping, and wildlife management practices. It cites surveys showing most Vermonters are satisfied with the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department (3% dissatisfaction in 2015, 5% in 2022) and claims animal rights groups prioritize their agenda over conservation. The author, a Vermont resident, defends hunters, trappers, and anglers as responsible conservationists.
- Vermonters need to do their part to keep bears wild
Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department authorized the killing of a bear in Stowe after it became too comfortable around humans. The department warns that without proactive community measures like securing trash and birdfeeders, more bears will face similar outcomes. Efforts include public education, habitat conservation, and partnerships to promote coexistence.
- Trust in Vermont Fish and Wildlife is eroding
Trust in the Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department is declining due to controversial changes in bear management policies, including extending hunting seasons and issuing additional bear tags without public input or scientific justification. The department reversed its initial recommendations after aligning with a hunter's petition, raising concerns about transparency and private assurances influencing decisions.
- When a state agency loses its way
The Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department is criticized for failing to represent Vermonters, using public funds for a greenwashing campaign on Vermont Public, and prioritizing image management over addressing wildlife threats. The letter alleges mismanagement, lack of staff diversity, and neglect of public interests by the department and state leadership.
- Vermont’s public lands are costly to maintain. And soon, many may be more expensive to visit.
Vermont's public lands face rising maintenance costs, leading to proposed fee increases for state parks and federal recreation sites. State and federal agencies aim to balance affordability with necessary maintenance, with Vermont Governor Phil Scott supporting the proposals while emphasizing accessibility for low-income families.
- Vermont’s public lands are costly to maintain. And soon, many may be more expensive to visit.
Vermont’s public lands face rising maintenance costs and proposed fee increases for state parks and federal recreation sites. Officials, including Vermont Fish and Wildlife Department chief Andrea Shortsleeve, highlight challenges balancing infrastructure needs with affordability concerns. The U.S. Forest Service plans higher fees for activities in the Green Mountain National Forest to offset maintenance costs.