U.S. Postal Service

The Trump administration renewed its request for the U.S. Supreme Court to quickly decide on an executive order that would limit vote-by-mail, a measure requiring states to list voters and restrict postal delivery. The urgency increased after U.S. District Judge Indira Talwani issued an injunction blocking the order nationwide just before Election Day. Because of the tight timeline, the judge ruled the executive branch has no authority to regulate elections.

The Trump administration has urgently requested a ruling from the U.S. Supreme Court regarding an executive order aimed at limiting vote-by-mail. This request became more urgent after a federal judge blocked the executive order nationwide, noting that the executive branch lacks authority to regulate elections. The original executive order sought to restrict ballot delivery and require states to list voters who intended to vote by mail.

The Trump administration renewed its request to the U.S. Supreme Court for a quick decision regarding an executive order that limits vote-by-mail. This came after a Massachusetts federal judge expanded an injunction nationwide, ruling that "the executive branch has no authority to regulate elections." The original executive order would have required states to provide voters lists and restrict the U.S. Postal Service from delivering ballots to those not on the list.

A U.S. Postal Service mail truck driver was arrested in Hell's Kitchen, Manhattan, following a fatal hit-and-run crash that occurred on Saturday. The NYPD stated that James Simmons, 61, was charged with leaving the scene of an accident after the deadly incident.

The author argues that America's unmatched advantage is its ability to adapt to changing circumstances, rather than just inventing things. This adaptability is seen throughout history, from the Persian Empire’s courier system and advancements by companies like UPS and Amazon, to how AOL helped society adopt the Internet by popularizing email and instant messaging.

President Donald Trump's executive order mandating changes to mail-in-voting systems faces opposition from 24 Democratic state officials, who argue it creates mass confusion and risks disenfranchising voters before the November midterm elections. The U.S. Supreme Court is considering whether to maintain a stay on the order, as states claim they lack time to comply with its requirements.

Pennsylvania and other states are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to block the Trump administration’s executive order requiring federal agencies to verify voter eligibility and handle mail ballots. The order, which states call legally indefensible, would force states to redesign election materials weeks before the midterm election, risking voter disenfranchisement.

Democratic state officials, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, urge the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a stay on President Donald Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems, arguing it would disenfranchise voters and create confusion ahead of the November midterm elections. The officials claim the order improperly assigns election administration responsibilities to federal agencies like the U.S. Postal Service and the Department of Homeland Security.

The U.S. Postal Service is hosting six job fairs in the Capital Region during August.

Democratic state officials urged the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a pause on President Donald Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems, arguing compliance before the November midterms is impossible and risks disenfranchising voters. The officials emphasized that the order would create confusion and that the executive branch lacks constitutional authority to administer elections.

Democratic state officials argue that President Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems cannot be implemented before November's midterm elections. They urge the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a stay on the order, citing constitutional concerns and risks of voter disenfranchisement, particularly for disabled and rural voters.

Democratic state officials argue that President Donald Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems cannot be implemented before November's midterm elections and request the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a pause on the order. They claim the order would disrupt voting rules, disenfranchise voters, and lack constitutional authority, as election administration is reserved for states.

Democratic state officials argue that President Donald Trump's executive order mandating changes to mail-in-voting systems cannot be implemented before the November midterm elections due to time constraints. They claim the order is unconstitutional, as election administration is a state responsibility, and warn it could disenfranchise voters reliant on mail voting. The Supreme Court is considering the issue on its emergency docket.

Democratic state officials, including Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, urged the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a pause on President Donald Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems. They argued the order would cause confusion and disenfranchise voters before November's midterm elections, citing insufficient time for compliance and risks to mail ballot delivery.

Democratic state officials argue that President Donald Trump’s executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems cannot be implemented by November’s midterm elections and urge the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a pause on the order. They claim the order, which involves the U.S. Postal Service and Department of Homeland Security, would disrupt voting systems and disenfranchise voters, particularly those relying on mail ballots.

Democratic state officials urge the Supreme Court to maintain a pause on President Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems, arguing states cannot comply before November's midterms. They claim the order oversteps executive authority and risks disenfranchising voters by creating confusion.

Democratic state officials, led by California Attorney General Rob Bonta, urged the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a pause on an executive order mandating changes to mail-in-voting systems before November's midterm elections. They argued the order would create confusion and disenfranchise voters, particularly those with disabilities and in rural areas. The officials emphasized that election administration is a state responsibility under the Constitution, not the federal government.

Democratic state officials urge the U.S. Supreme Court to maintain a stay on President Donald Trump's executive order requiring changes to mail-in-voting systems, arguing compliance is impossible before the November midterms and could disenfranchise voters. The Justice Department seeks the Supreme Court to overturn a stay that paused the order.

23 states and the District of Columbia are urging the Supreme Court to maintain a federal court order blocking the federal government from implementing provisions of an executive order on mail-in voting ahead of the November 2026 elections. The executive order, issued by President Donald Trump, requires federal agencies to create voter eligibility lists and restrict USPS ballot transmission, which the states argue infringes on state authority over elections. A lower court blocked the order's implementation for 2026 elections but allowed challenges related to the upcoming midterms.

Democratic states are urging the Supreme Court to block President Trump's executive order requiring the U.S. Postal Service to use state-by-state lists of eligible voters for mail ballots. The order mandates USPS to align with these lists to determine who can send a ballot by mail.

Democratic states are urging the Supreme Court to block an executive order by President Trump that requires the U.S. Postal Service to use state-by-state lists of eligible voters who may send a ballot by mail.

Two Las Vegas women, Maguadalupe Barajas Sandoval and Cynthia Leslie Hurtado, were arrested for allegedly shipping methamphetamine from Nevada to Miami-Dade County via USPS as part of a drug trafficking ring. Investigators intercepted multiple packages containing methamphetamine, including two shipments totaling approximately 2.38 pounds, during a multi-agency operation involving the Miami-Dade Sheriff’s Office and federal agencies.

A U.S. Postal Service worker stole a winning Florida Lottery ticket from the mail and cashed it in, leading to her arrest and multiple felony charges. The incident occurred after a lottery player reported the missing ticket, which was traced to the worker who redeemed it in Miami.

A federal appeals court allowed President Trump’s executive order limiting vote-by-mail to proceed, contradicting another court’s ruling that blocked it. The conflicting decisions suggest the U.S. Supreme Court may resolve the dispute, with the order’s implementation potentially affecting states ahead of the midterm elections.

President Trump's executive order on mail balloting and concerns over Postal Service delays are central to midterm election preparations. Postal Service faces criticism for late ballot deliveries in California and Wisconsin, prompting some states to advise against mail-in voting. The agency asserts its commitment to election processes despite ongoing legal challenges to Trump's order.

Twelve Republican-led states joined a Supreme Court challenge to defend an executive order by President Donald Trump aimed at restricting mail-in voting by requiring citizenship verification and USPS ballot delivery reforms. A Massachusetts court had blocked parts of the order, citing potential election chaos, while the Republican states argue it enhances election security.

Mail ballot delays and President Donald Trump’s push for changes are causing increased scrutiny of the U.S. Postal Service ahead of the midterm elections. The delays have raised concerns about potential disruptions in mail-in voting processes.

Federal courts issued conflicting rulings on President Donald Trump's executive order restricting vote-by-mail, with one court allowing implementation and another blocking it, prompting a potential Supreme Court decision. The order requires the U.S. Postal Service and Department of Homeland Security to collect voter data, raising concerns about voter impact ahead of midterm elections.

Federal courts issued conflicting rulings on President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting vote-by-mail. One appeals court allowed the order to proceed, stating agencies had not yet implemented it, while another blocked it, citing potential harm to states. The U.S. Supreme Court may resolve the dispute after the Trump administration appealed.

Dr. Anthony Fauci invoked the Fifth Amendment during a Republican-led Senate hearing on his handling of the COVID-19 pandemic. Sen. Rand Paul subpoenaed Fauci, who received a preemptive pardon from President Joe Biden, to testify about NIH funding and virus research.

Federal courts issued conflicting rulings on President Donald Trump's executive order restricting vote-by-mail. The D.C. Circuit Court allowed the order to proceed, while the 1st Circuit Court blocked it, creating a path for the U.S. Supreme Court to resolve the dispute. The order directs the USPS and DHS to compile voter data but lacks final implementation rules.

Dr. Anthony Fauci is subpoenaed by Senator Rand Paul to testify about the origins of the coronavirus. The U.S. Postal Service faces scrutiny over mail ballot processing as midterm elections approach. James Comey's legal team alleges misconduct in his prosecution for threatening President Trump on social media.

Trump’s attacks on mail balloting and concerns over delays position the U.S. Postal Service as a central figure in the upcoming midterm elections. The Postal Service's role is highlighted amid political tensions and logistical worries.

President Trump's executive order on mail balloting and concerns over delayed ballot deliveries by the U.S. Postal Service are centering the election spotlight on the agency. Democratic officials in California, Wisconsin, Kansas, and Michigan have raised concerns about late-arriving ballots, while the Postal Service asserts its commitment to the electoral process. Legal challenges to Trump's order are ongoing, with the Supreme Court considering the case.

President Donald Trump's executive order on mail balloting and concerns over U.S. Postal Service delays are central to the midterm elections. Postal Service faces criticism for late ballot deliveries in California and Wisconsin, while legal challenges to Trump's order are ongoing.

A federal appeals court in Washington, D.C., allowed President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting vote-by-mail to proceed, while a separate appeals court in the 1st Circuit blocked it, creating a conflict likely to be resolved by the U.S. Supreme Court. The order directs the USPS and DHS to collect voter data, but implementation is stalled as agencies have not finalized rules. Voting rights groups argue the order could harm states by diverting election resources.

Conflicting federal court rulings on President Trump's executive order restricting vote-by-mail, with one court allowing implementation and another blocking it, prompting a potential Supreme Court resolution. The order requires the U.S. Postal Service and Department of Homeland Security to compile voter data, with one court deeming the case unripe for review and another finding immediate harm to states.

Federal courts have issued conflicting rulings on President Trump's executive order limiting vote-by-mail, with one court allowing its implementation pending rulemaking and another blocking it due to potential state harm. The Supreme Court may resolve the dispute, as the Trump administration has appealed the opposing decision.

Federal courts issued conflicting rulings on President Donald Trump’s executive order restricting vote-by-mail, with one court allowing its implementation and another blocking it, prompting a potential Supreme Court resolution. The order requires the USPS and DHS to collect voter data, but agencies have not yet finalized rules. Voting rights groups argue the order could harm states by diverting resources ahead of the midterm elections.

A federal appellate panel refused to block President Trump's executive order restricting mail voting, citing premature legal challenges, while a separate Massachusetts court blocked the order, with both cases pending at the U.S. Supreme Court. The Postal Service is being directed to create an online portal for mail ballot eligibility under the order, according to postal workers' union representatives.