Steven Molo
Coverage of Steven Molo in the Nexus archive.
- Closing time
The Musk v. Altman trial concluded with closing arguments, where Steven Molo, Musk's lawyer, struggled with his words and lacked evidence, while OpenAI's lawyer, Sarah Eddy, presented a strong case with chronological evidence. Musk's claims were questioned, and the judge corrected Molo's errors. The trial highlighted the weakness of Musk's legal claims.
- Musk lawyers accuse OpenAI of deception in close of mega-trial
Elon Musk's lawyers have accused OpenAI of deception and misusing donated millions, seeking billions in damages and the removal of CEO Sam Altman from the board. The trial involves allegations of breached duties to OpenAI's charitable mission. A jury verdict is pending, with a separate portion to decide damages if the ruling is against OpenAI and/or Microsoft.
- OpenAI’s president does ‘all the things,’ except answer a question
Elon Musk's case against OpenAI is ongoing, with Greg Brockman being a key witness. Brockman was cross-examined and directly examined in an unusual order. He corrected Musk's attorney on minor details during the examination.
- Musk casts himself as AI's good guy in testimony vs. OpenAI
Elon Musk testified in his lawsuit against OpenAI, portraying himself as an AI safety advocate while accusing OpenAI of prioritizing profit. OpenAI countered that Musk supported a for-profit model when he could control it, highlighting conflicting motivations in the trial over AI governance.