PIL

The Karnataka High Court issued a notice to the State government on a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) petition seeking to declare the Mullayyanagiri Hills in Chikkamagaluru district as a 'conservation reserve' under Section 36A of the Wild Life (Protection) Act, 1972.

The Delhi High Court refused to list a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) on a violent police crackdown during a CJP protest for urgent hearing, stating the matter would be addressed the following day.

Delhi High Court refused interim relief on a hospital transfer case. Gitanjali Angmo stated the PIL was 'wrongly interpreted' and mentioned filing another petition on July 20.

SDPI accused the Kerala government of betraying minority interests by supporting a PIL that led the High Court to impose operational restrictions on the State Waqf Board.

A PIL challenges the renewal of bar licenses and demands a CBI probe. The petition seeks an investigation into the process of license renewals for the legal profession.

The Kerala High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the free travel scheme for women and transgender persons in KSRTC ordinary buses, stating there was no evidence in the plea to prove the government order was illegal.

A Public Interest Litigation (PIL) is challenging the free travel scheme for women in Kerala State Road Transport Corporation (KSRTC) ordinary buses. The High Court has reserved the matter for orders, and the petitioner argued no study was conducted before implementing the scheme.

The Karnataka High Court dismissed a PIL challenging the allocation of veterinary university land for constructing quarters for judges. The decision upholds the allotment of the land for the specified judicial housing purpose.