Local Law 52

A federal judge blocked New York City's Local Law 52, which aimed to prevent rideshare companies from abruptly deactivating drivers, ruling it unconstitutional. The decision favors Uber and Lyft's argument that the law infringes on their contractual rights, while city officials and advocacy groups oppose the ruling.

A Manhattan judge blocked a New York City law (Local Law 52) aimed at protecting Uber and Lyft drivers from sudden deactivation, citing potential safety concerns. The law required 14 days’ notice and an appeals process for drivers, but Uber and Lyft argued it could hinder safety measures. The city’s Department of Consumer and Worker Protection and Councilmember Shekar Krishnan oppose the injunction.

App drivers, including former Lyft driver Elena Zerkal, protested Uber and Lyft's legal challenge against a New York City law aimed at preventing sudden deactivation of ride-hailing drivers. The law, Local Law 52, was approved by the City Council to provide due process protections for drivers, but Uber and Lyft are contesting it in federal court. Drivers argue they are abruptly deactivated without explanation, as in Zerkal's case where she was removed after intervening in a passenger's harassment.

Uber is suing New York City to block Local Law 52, which mandates the company provide just cause for driver deactivations and allows thousands of drivers deactivated since 2019 to seek reinstatement.