Live Nation-Ticketmaster
Coverage of Live Nation-Ticketmaster in the Nexus archive.
- States ask judge to break up Live Nation-Ticketmaster
More than 30 states are requesting that Judge Arun Subramanian order the breakup of Live Nation-Ticketmaster following an April jury verdict finding the company an illegal monopolist. The states are asking for a sale of the ticketing company and a sufficient number of large amphitheaters, along with restrictions on tying access to venues to the use of its promotion services.
- Democrats preview how they’d go after the Ticketmaster settlement if they regain power
Democrats held an unofficial hearing to criticize the Department of Justice's settlement with Live Nation-Ticketmaster, potentially previewing their approach to antitrust deals if they regain power. The settlement was worth up to $280 million. Democrats currently lack the power to set committee agendas.
- Ticketmaster’s monopoly verdict opens the door to real reform
A jury ruled that Live Nation-Ticketmaster is a monopoly in violation of federal and state antitrust laws. The states that brought the case should use their leverage to press for a settlement with real consumer protections. This could open up the marketplace to more competition.
- Live Nation says it will fight monopoly suit loss
Live Nation-Ticketmaster plans to appeal a jury verdict that found them guilty of antitrust violations, including overcharging consumers $1.72 per ticket. The company aims to challenge the states' case and awaits a court decision on disqualifying an expert witness's testimony.
- Ticketmaster is an illegal monopoly, jury rules
A Manhattan jury ruled Live Nation-Ticketmaster an illegal monopolist, potentially leading to its breakup. This decision contrasts with a previous Trump-era settlement and could face appeals, with Judge Arun Subramanian considering remedies beyond settlement terms.
- A jury is about to decide the fate of Ticketmaster
A jury is set to determine if Live Nation-Ticketmaster's business practices constitute illegal monopolization of the concert industry, following widespread consumer complaints and state-level antitrust claims. Over 30 states have pursued legal action against the company despite a federal settlement, with Pennsylvania's attorneys general office urging patience due to the volume of grievances.