Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Liss v. Lewiston-Richards Inc.

Coverage of Liss v. Lewiston-Richards Inc. in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jul 31 · 22:44 UTCMost recent: Jul 31 · 22:44 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Michigan Supreme Courtorganization1Dana Nesselperson1Eli Lilly and Companyorganization1Michigan Consumer Protection Acttopic1Smith v. Globe Life Insurance Companytopic1Sam Singhperson1
Recent coverage
  • BUSINESSJul 31 · 22:44 UTCMICHIGAN ADVANCE
    Michigan Supreme Court sides with Nessel, overrules cases curtailing consumer protection law

    The Michigan Supreme Court ruled 4-3 to allow Attorney General Dana Nessel to proceed with a price-gouging investigation against Eli Lilly and Company over insulin pricing. The court overturned two prior cases (Smith v. Globe Life Insurance Company and Liss v. Lewiston-Richards Inc.) that had misinterpreted an exemption in the Michigan Consumer Protection Act, enabling the AG to challenge licensed businesses for deceptive practices. The decision remanded the case to a lower court for further proceedings.

Liss v. Lewiston-Richards Inc. · Dossier · The Nexus