Guttmacher Institute
Coverage of Guttmacher Institute in the Nexus archive.
- More GOP party platforms include anti-IVF language. Is surrogacy next?
Idaho Democratic state Rep. Brooke Green faced a cancer diagnosis fueled by estrogen and progesterone hormones following procedures involving IVF and surrogacy for her children. Opposition to both methods is rising, with Republicans in several states adding anti-IVF language to party platforms. Critics argue that discarding embryos during IVF is akin to abortion, connecting it to calls for codifying personhood rights for fetuses or embryos.
- More GOP party platforms include anti-IVF language. Is surrogacy next?
Opposition to both IVF and surrogacy is increasing, with Republicans in Idaho and four other states adding specific anti-IVF language to their state party platforms. Opponents argue that discarding embryos is akin to abortion and have pushed for legislation across at least 17 states to codify personhood rights for embryos or fetuses.
- More GOP party platforms include anti-IVF language. Is surrogacy next?
Democratic state Rep. Brooke Green was diagnosed with a cancer fueled by hormones related to pregnancy following an attempt at IVF near her final remaining embryo implant. Despite having previously helped codify best practices for surrogacy agencies in Idaho, opposition against both IVF and surrogacy is reportedly rising. Critics argue that the use of these methods by same-sex couples and the discarding of embryos during IVF are connected to anti-abortion beliefs.
- More Republican Party platforms include anti-IVF language. Is surrogacy next?
Idaho state Rep. Brooke Green received cancer fueled by hormones associated with pregnancy after procedures involving in vitro fertilization. Opposition to both IVF and surrogacy is escalating, which has led Republicans in multiple states to add anti-IVF language to party platforms. Critics also argue that the methods concern same-sex couples, facilitate 'birth tourism,' or raise issues regarding embryo personhood rights.
- Michigan was to be a ‘haven state’ for abortion. It didn’t happen
Although Michigan was predicted to become an abortion “haven state” following rulings that overturned Roe v. Wade, local clinics are experiencing a slowdown in patient volume. Data indicates that fewer than 2,000 people traveled into Michigan for abortion care in 2025, which is lower than the numbers recorded in both 2023 and 2024.
- Missourians getting abortion pills by mail from out-of-state providers quadrupled since 2023
Missourians obtaining abortion pills via telehealth from out-of-state providers quadrupled from 880 in 2023 to 3,220 in 2025, according to Guttmacher Institute data. A Jackson County court ruling in June 2025 partially lifted abortion restrictions but did not allow in-state telehealth medication prescriptions, forcing patients to seek care from out-of-state providers.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: Fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing abstinence, marriage, and fertility awareness methods, moving away from evidence-based approaches. Critics argue this approach, aligned with conservative initiatives like Make America Healthy Again, may increase teen pregnancy rates, as abstinence-only programs have historically shown lower effectiveness.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: Fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing fertility awareness, abstinence, and marriage, moving away from evidence-based methods. Critics argue this approach, aligned with conservative 'restorative reproductive medicine,' may increase teen pregnancy rates and affects organizations like Children’s Aid in New York City.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: Fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing abstinence, marriage, and fertility awareness methods, moving away from evidence-based approaches. Critics argue this pivot may increase teen pregnancy rates, as abstinence-only programs have historically shown higher teen birth rates. The new policy aligns with conservative initiatives like restorative reproductive medicine, which prioritizes tracking fertility over contraception use.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: Fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing fertility tracking, abstinence, and marriage, moving away from evidence-based initiatives. Critics argue this approach prioritizes pregnancy planning over prevention, with studies showing abstinence-only methods increase teen pregnancy rates. Organizations like Children’s Aid, which previously received grants, are affected by the policy change.
- The Trump administration shifts teen pregnancy prevention from contraception to fertility tracking, abstinence and marriage
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing fertility tracking, abstinence, and marriage, moving away from contraception and evidence-based methods. The new approach aligns with restorative reproductive medicine, which prioritizes fertility awareness over birth control, and affects organizations like Children’s Aid in New York City.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing fertility awareness, anatomy, and abstinence, moving away from evidence-based methods. Critics argue this approach may increase teen pregnancy rates, as abstinence-only programs have historically shown higher rates of teen births.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding to prioritize abstinence, marriage, and fertility awareness methods over evidence-based programs. The new approach aligns with conservative initiatives promoting restorative reproductive medicine, which discourages contraception and focuses on tracking fertility indicators. Critics argue this shift may increase teen pregnancy rates and diverts resources from high-need populations.
- Feds have a new teen pregnancy prevention plan: fertility and ‘reproductive goals’
The Trump administration is shifting federal teen pregnancy prevention funding toward programs emphasizing abstinence, marriage, and fertility awareness methods. Critics argue this approach prioritizes pregnancy planning over prevention and diverges from evidence-based strategies that reduced teen birth rates by 72% over 16 years.
- Unlocking human development
Pakistan has established a National Population Council to address high population growth and improve human development. The council aims to learn from countries like Bangladesh and India, which reduced fertility rates through education, women's empowerment, and family planning. The article highlights Pakistan's lagging human development indicators and the need for urgent investment in healthcare and education.
- Abortion medication, HPV vaccine laws take effect Wednesday in three states
New laws in Iowa, Mississippi, and Tennessee restrict access to abortion medications and limit minors' access to sexual and reproductive healthcare, including the HPV vaccine. A federal lawsuit challenges FDA rules allowing mifepristone to be dispensed via telehealth, with nationwide implications.
- Abortion medication, HPV vaccine laws take effect Wednesday in three states
New laws in Iowa, Mississippi, and Tennessee restrict access to abortion medications and HPV vaccines for minors, effective July 1. The laws require in-person dispensing of abortion pills and prohibit minors under 18 from consenting to STD-related vaccinations in Iowa. A federal lawsuit challenges FDA rules allowing telehealth dispensing of mifepristone, which could impact nationwide access.
- Abortion medication, HPV vaccine laws take effect today in three states
New laws in Iowa, Mississippi, and Tennessee restrict access to abortion medications like mifepristone and misoprostol and limit minors' access to the HPV vaccine. A federal lawsuit challenges FDA rules allowing telehealth dispensing of mifepristone, with nationwide implications.
- Study: Reproductive healthcare out of reach of one third of Florida women
A study found that 34% of women in Florida needed but did not receive reproductive healthcare services between 2024 and 2025, higher than the national average of 30%. Factors include Florida's restrictive abortion policies, lack of Medicaid expansion, and barriers like a six-week abortion ban and 24-hour waiting period.
- Illinois’ Abortion Landscape Continues To Evolve Amid Persistent Growth In Demand
Illinois has become a destination for abortion seekers following the overturn of Roe v. Wade, with rising demand and costs prompting increased financial aid. The Chicago Abortion Fund provided over $25 million in support in 2025, and a new public-private fund aims to assist clinics handling out-of-state patients.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which traditionally provided contraception access, to emphasize childbearing and family formation. The new guidelines prioritize natural methods for avoiding pregnancy and addressing infertility, potentially harming low-income and minority women reliant on the program.
- Missouri judge finds state laws restricting abortion violate voter-approved constitutional amendment
A Missouri judge ruled that state laws restricting abortion violate a 2024 voter-approved constitutional amendment, striking down provisions like a 72-hour waiting period and in-person requirements for abortion pill prescriptions. The decision allows Planned Parenthood affiliates to resume prescribing abortion pills for the first time since 2018, though the state may appeal and another ballot measure is pending.
- Missouri judge finds state laws restricting abortion violate voter-approved constitutional amendment
A Missouri judge ruled that several state laws restricting abortion violate a 2024 voter-approved constitutional amendment, allowing abortion until fetal viability. The decision enables Missouri Planned Parenthood affiliates to resume prescribing abortion pills for the first time since 2018, though the state plans to appeal and a future ballot measure remains pending.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which traditionally provided access to contraception, toward an emphasis on childbearing and family formation. The new guidelines prioritize natural methods to avoid pregnancy and promote fertility education, while prohibiting DEI efforts and linking to immigration restrictions. Health policy researchers warn this will disproportionately harm low-income and minority women reliant on Title X services.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the Title X federal program, which traditionally provided access to contraception, to prioritize promoting childbearing and family formation. New guidelines emphasize natural pregnancy prevention methods, fertility education, and aligning with efforts to increase the U.S. birth rate, while prohibiting DEI initiatives and restricting abortion-related services.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which traditionally provided contraception access, to emphasize childbearing and family formation. New guidelines prioritize natural pregnancy prevention methods, infertility treatments, and 'body literacy education,' while prohibiting DEI efforts and linking funding to reduced immigration facilitation. Critics argue the changes will disproportionately harm low-income and minority women.
- Trump overhauls federal birth control program to promote ‘family formation,’ fertility awareness
The Trump administration is overhauling the federal Title X program, shifting its focus from contraception to promoting family formation and fertility awareness. The new guidelines prioritize natural methods to prevent pregnancy and address infertility, while prohibiting DEI efforts and linking funding to immigration policies. Health policy researchers warn the changes may disproportionately harm low-income and minority women.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which traditionally provided access to contraception, toward promoting childbearing and family formation. New guidelines prioritize natural pregnancy prevention methods and address infertility, while prohibiting DEI efforts and linking funding to anti-immigration policies. Critics argue the changes will disproportionately harm low-income and minority women reliant on Title X services.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which provides contraception access, to emphasize family formation and healthy pregnancies. The change prioritizes natural pregnancy methods and opposes abortion, with critics arguing it will harm low-income and minority women reliant on the program.
- Trump changes pregnancy-prevention program to promote childbearing
The Trump administration is shifting the federal Title X program, which provides reproductive health services, to prioritize promoting childbearing and family formation over contraception access. New guidelines emphasize natural pregnancy prevention methods, fertility education, and aligning with efforts to boost the U.S. birth rate, while prohibiting DEI initiatives and linking funding to immigration restrictions. Critics argue the changes will disproportionately harm low-income and minority women.
- Republican attorneys general urge EPA to classify mifepristone as water contaminant
Fourteen Republican state attorneys general and 19 GOP members of Congress are urging the EPA to classify mifepristone, an abortion medication, as a water contaminant. Environmental experts and the Center for Biological Diversity state there is no evidence of harm from mifepristone in water systems, citing a 1996 FDA statement and common drug trace amounts in water.
- Republican attorneys general urge EPA to classify mifepristone as water contaminant
Fourteen Republican state attorneys general and 19 GOP members of Congress are urging the EPA to classify mifepristone, an abortion medication, as a water contaminant. Environmental experts state there is no evidence that mifepristone in wastewater harms humans or the environment, while the request cites a 1996 FDA statement acknowledging the drug may enter the environment but noting harmful effects are 'not anticipated.'
- Republican attorneys general urge EPA to classify mifepristone as water contaminant
Fourteen Republican state attorneys general and 19 GOP members of Congress are urging the EPA to classify the abortion medication mifepristone as a water contaminant. Environmental experts and advocacy groups state there is no evidence that mifepristone harms water systems or humans, while states have introduced legislation to test for the drug in water.
- Republican attorneys general urge EPA to classify mifepristone as water contaminant
Fourteen Republican state attorneys general and 19 GOP members of Congress are urging the EPA to classify the abortion medication mifepristone as a water contaminant, citing a 1996 FDA statement. Environmental experts and the Center for Biological Diversity state there is no evidence mifepristone harms water systems or humans, while state lawmakers in seven states introduced bills addressing medication abortion's environmental impact.
- Republican attorneys general urge EPA to classify mifepristone as water contaminant
Fourteen state attorneys general and 19 GOP members of Congress are urging the EPA to regulate mifepristone, an abortion medication, as a water contaminant. Environmental experts state there is no evidence that mifepristone harms water systems, while the request references a 1996 FDA statement acknowledging potential environmental entry but no anticipated harm.
- American women have been lied to about motherhood and it’s time to fix it
American women are often misled about motherhood and abortion, with many feeling pressured into abortions due to financial and housing difficulties. A significant number of women seeking abortions already have children and would prefer to parent if their circumstances were different. Organizations like Planned Parenthood and the Human Coalition play a role in this issue.
- Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
A federal appeals court blocked the mailing of the abortion pill mifepristone under current FDA rules, requiring in-person prescriptions and likely sparking a Supreme Court battle. The 5th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals decision restores pre-pandemic safety protocols, citing concerns over adverse event reporting and state authority, while critics warn it will limit abortion access nationwide.
- Federal appeals court blocks mailing of abortion pills in ruling with nationwide effect
A federal appeals court blocked the mailing of the abortion pill mifepristone under FDA rules, citing safety concerns and state authority, with a nationwide effect. The ruling requires in-person prescriptions for mifepristone, reversing pandemic-era changes, and sets up a potential Supreme Court challenge over abortion access.
- Appeals court limits abortion pill access
A federal appeals court temporarily halted rules allowing teleprescribing and mailing of abortion drugs, a move backed by anti-abortion groups. The 5th Circuit's decision supports Louisiana's challenge to Biden administration policies expanding access to mifepristone, which now accounts for over 60% of abortions. Reproductive rights advocates warn this will restrict access to necessary care.