Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Brendan Ballou

Coverage of Brendan Ballou in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: May 14 · 14:30 UTCMost recent: May 18 · 23:10 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Recent coverage
  • POLITICSMay 18 · 23:10 UTCSEMAFOR
    Critics of Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization fund’ have no way to contest it yet

    The Trump administration has established an 'anti-weaponization fund' worth $1.8 billion to pay political allies, but critics face significant legal barriers to challenging it in court due to the lack of clear standing to sue. Legal experts note that once payments are made, they will be extremely difficult to reverse, though potential grounds for future litigation may include constitutional emoluments clause violations or False Claims Act violations if whistleblowers emerge.

  • BUSINESSMay 14 · 14:30 UTCTHE VERGE
    How companies weaponize the terms of service against you

    Brendan Ballou discusses his book When Companies Run the Courts about the rise of forced arbitration and its impact on consumers. He also talks about a lawsuit filed by the Public Integrity Project against Paramount over the Warner Bros. merger. The lawsuit alleges possible quid pro quo with the Trump administration.

Brendan Ballou · Dossier · The Nexus