Benn Jordan
Coverage of Benn Jordan in the Nexus archive.
- Flock says its cameras don’t track people. Its own training videos say otherwise.
Flock Safety claims its cameras do not track people, but its training videos demonstrate police using the system to track suspects across multiple locations. Security researcher Benn Jordan and app DeFlock founder Will Freeman highlight that Flock's Condor cameras use AI to follow individuals, and police can access 30 days of vehicle movement data without a warrant.
- Flock says its cameras don’t track people. Its own training videos say otherwise.
Flock Safety claims its surveillance cameras do not track people, but its training videos demonstrate police using the system to track suspects across locations. Security researcher Benn Jordan revealed Flock cameras stream openly online, while DeFlock app founder Will Freeman mapped 88,970 cameras. Flock's Condor cameras use AI to follow pedestrians, contradicting the company's assertion that it only captures fixed points in time.
- Flock says its cameras don’t track people. Its own training videos say otherwise.
Flock Safety claims its surveillance cameras do not track people, but its training videos show police using the system to track suspects across locations. The company's Condor cameras use AI to follow pedestrians, and its license plate readers enable warrantless tracking of vehicles for 30 days. Security researcher Benn Jordan and app developer Will Freeman have highlighted the invasive capabilities of Flock's network.
- Benn Jordan longs for the days of tech that didn’t spy on you
Benn Jordan transitioned his YouTube channel from music gear reviews to science and technology investigations, focusing on the surveillance state. His work now centers on critiques of surveillance technology, with occasional music-related content.
- Contra Benn Jordan, data center (and all) sub-audible infrasound issues are fake
The article challenges Benn Jordan's claims about sub-audible infrasound issues from data centers, asserting these concerns are unfounded and likely based on misinformation. It references a Hacker News discussion and the author's blog to argue against the validity of such claims.