Skip to content
The Nexus
DossierENTITY

Abbott v. LULAC

Coverage of Abbott v. LULAC in the Nexus archive.

Earliest in view: Jul 28 · 12:50 UTCMost recent: Jul 28 · 12:50 UTC
Co-mentioned in this coverage
Recent coverage
  • POLITICSJul 28 · 12:50 UTCJUST SECURITY
    The Supreme Court’s Striking Regression on Partisan Gerrymandering

    The U.S. Supreme Court's decision in Louisiana v. Callais and Abbott v. LULAC has legitimized partisan gerrymandering as a constitutional government purpose, allowing it to override the Voting Rights Act's protections against racial discrimination in redistricting. The rulings require plaintiffs challenging discriminatory maps to prove alternative maps can achieve both anti-discrimination goals and partisan objectives, effectively granting states a constitutional right to prioritize partisan interests over equitable representation.

Abbott v. LULAC · Dossier · The Nexus