BUSINESSFORTUNE
Vanguard Chief Economist: AI and jobs, still in an ATM phase
The article uses historical examples, such as ATMs and mobile banking, to argue that isolated task automation rarely causes large-scale job losses. Meaningful disruption occurs when technologies are combined with new workflows, business models, and institutional changes. The author suggests that if AI becomes a general-purpose technology like electricity or the personal computer, fears of widespread job loss are likely overblown.
Mentioned
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- Preparing for the AI jobs apocalypse
- AI may be killing some high-tech jobs, but it’s also creating others. See who’s winning and losing.
- A reality check on the AI jobs hysteria
- The tech jobs bust is real. Don’t blame AI (yet)
- The AI revolution threatens office jobs, but revives demand for skilled trades