BUSINESSCOURTHOUSE NEWS
Second Circuit holds wild fish are not ‘property’ under False Claims Act
The Second Circuit ruled that wild fish are not 'property' under the False Claims Act, dismissing a $2 billion lawsuit against Cooke Seafood and Omega Protein. The case alleged the companies used a sham company to illegally harvest fish in U.S. waters, but the court affirmed that the government's regulatory authority over wild fish does not equate to ownership.
Mentioned
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- Maine lobster defamation case smells fishy to First Circuit
- Appeals court says fishermen's claim in lobster defamation suit raises First Amendment questions
- 11th Circuit revives fishermen’s negligence suit against Tennessee Valley Authority
- Judge upholds protections for Southern California steelhead trout