SECURITYDAWN
Abeyance without proof
India's decision to place the Indus Waters Treaty (IWT) in abeyance is criticized as legally invalid, as the treaty lacks a suspension clause and relies on disputed facts. The article highlights India's unproven allegations against Pakistan regarding the Pahalgam terrorist attack and cross-border terrorism, which Pakistan denies. It argues that such disputes fall outside the IWT's scope and should be addressed through other international forums.
Mentioned
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- Rep. Olszewski Expresses Skepticism Over Iran MOU Details
- Mexico refuses to designate Iran’s proxies as terrorist groups
- FACT CHECK: Oshiomhole’s claim on Akpoti-Uduaghan’s suspension is untrue. Here is what he said.
- Conflicting Narratives Over US-Iran Ceasefire as Attacks Persist
- Alaska Deal or No Deal? US, Russia Clash Over Secret Trump-Putin Talks
- Why Todd Blanche Should Not Be Attorney General