POLITICSMINNPOST
Are we doomed to disagree? Not if we truly value diverse opinions
The article discusses differing risk assessments between individuals, illustrated by a 2008 encounter in Kabul between the author and a security guard. It references research in 'Predisposed' by political scientists John R. Alford, John R. Hibbing, and Kevin B. Smith, which suggests liberals and conservatives have biologically distinct responses to stimuli. The author argues that these differences do not doom disagreement, as humans evolved to communicate and cooperate.
Mentioned
Citizens LeagueorganizationMajority in the MiddleorganizationUniversity of Minnesota Center for the Study of Politics and GovernanceorganizationMinneapolis Regional ChamberorganizationSt. Paul Area ChamberorganizationJohn R. AlfordpersonJohn R. HibbingpersonKevin B. SmithpersonKabulplaceBlue Ridge Mountainsplacepolitical differencestopicsecuritytopic
Related Signal
Adjacent reporting
- STAT+: Where patients and hospitals disagree about AI
- Is there hope for the polarized state of American politics?
- Brazil’s polarised voters have one thing in common
- Therapy nation: Why Americans can’t stand each other anymore
- When token signals partly agree, how do you decide what actually matters most?