POLITICSJun 1 · 02:31 UTCNY POSTMiranda Devine

Miranda Devine: Dems can cry corruption all they want – the DOJ’s anti-weaponization fund has precedent and purpose

Miranda Devine argues the DOJ's Anti-Weaponization Fund is a valid initiative despite a flawed rollout, dismissing Democratic criticism as hypocritical and exaggerated. The article criticizes Oregon Sen. Ron Wyden and allied media for their negative reaction to the fund.

Nexus surfaces and summarizes. The full story lives at the source.

Mentioned

Miranda DevinepersonDOJ’s Anti-Weaponization FundtopicRon WydenpersonDemocratsorganization

Spot something wrong with this article?Report a problem →

Forward this

Related Signal

Adjacent reporting

POLITICSMay 31 · 16:39 UTC
Pence calls Trump’s ‘anti-weaponization’ fund ‘a bad idea’
POLITICSMay 24 · 19:36 UTC
Donalds defends anti-weaponization fund
POLITICSMay 25 · 15:26 UTC
Tillis ramps up criticism of DOJ compensation fund: ‘It‘s politically tone deaf’
POLITICSMay 22 · 15:22 UTC
Trump defends DOJ ‘anti-weaponization’ fund from GOP critics
POLITICSMay 22 · 15:31 UTC
Concerns about DOJ's "anti-weaponization fund" grow
POLITICSMay 18 · 19:45 UTC
Democrats: DOJ’s $1.776B ‘anti-weaponization’ fund ‘raises the specter of corruption unparalleled’